Posted on 04/20/2008 12:39:14 AM PDT by red state girl
WASHINGTON — Nancy Larson's most difficult conversation was, by far, the one with Chelsea Clinton.
"It was just heartbreaking," said Larson, a Democratic National Committee member from Minnesota and more to the point, a superdelegate who initially had pledged herself to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. This was April 12, after the former first daughter learned Larson would be shifting her allegiance to Illinois Sen. Barack Obama.
"She is a delightful young woman who loves her mother very much," Larson said. "She was really pushing me. She kept asking me why I was doing this. She just kept asking, 'Why? Why?' "
Many in the Clinton camp are asking that question these days, sometimes in conversations far less civil than that one. After nearly 20 years building relationships with a generation of Democrats, Clinton recently has suffered a steady erosion of support for her presidential campaign from the party stalwarts that once formed the basis of her perceived juggernaut of "inevitability."
(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.nwsource.com ...
The Clinton's don't have friends, just people they use for political purposes and throw away like trash the second they are no longer useful......or if get too much dirt on them, wind up broke, sick, or dead
Vince Foster was unavailable for comment.
ping ;)
chelsea’s not the brightest bulb:
she flunked out of pre-med.
if it were not for her parents,
no one would have ever heard of her.
So the opportunity to serve=a lifetime of servitude? Even military are free agents when they leave service. Imagine hearing 4 star generals talking feelings of "betrayal" over former and current military talking anti-US crapola. Amazing.
There's something really weird about these two sentences. I've no doubts Mr. Panetta really does see it this way.
I 'spose those who were "titled" by the Baronness and her husband never had qualifications to earn such positions, eh?
Real loyalties in politics is a rare commodity
The real question is: Why any liberal?
They do at that, Its going to be up to Pa. Republicans to keep Her thigh ness in the race a little longer so they can keep tearing each other apart.
“But there is something more wrenching at work, a reckoning of whether the Clintons, on balance, have been good or bad for the party.”
They are just now asking this question?
“Kerry, however, endorsed Obama shortly after the New Hampshire primary, even though, according to two sources close to the Clintons, he had promised Clinton he would not. (Kerry has disputed this.)”
HEHEHE this is funny. “I voted for Clinton before I voted against her....”
I don’t think Chelsea finished her question:
“WHY? WHY do I see the end of the gravy train??”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.