Posted on 04/19/2008 2:38:01 PM PDT by Mount Athos
Chrissy the poster boy for Metrosexuals with the hots for Hussein Obama is probably even hotter for his Hussein.
Just look at all of the opeds written by the gay mafia in the MSM since the debate. They are so funny to watch when they get mad and want to protect their boy friend, Hussein.
Thanks for the ping to Google’s search on Chrissy’s leg when it comes his hearthrob, Hussein Obamasnob.
Unfortunately that's not how the Law looks at it. Google up "fruit of the poisoned tree" sometime.
This whole case is going to get tossed.
L
bump! bump! bump!
- - - - -
Comment #81 Removed by Moderator
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Comment #82 Removed by Moderator
- - - - -
Well! Looks like some intruder/troll can’t stand the truth!
I took a snapshot of the page, for posterity’s sake. Hopefully Wayback has a picture of it.
Close to all being BS.
(1) They may or may not be the same person.
(2) The pledged delegate may or may not be an Obama supporter.
(3) It is highly unlikely BO ever heard of this woman before this story broke.
The reason is perhaps more insidious. Allow for some rampant speculation.
Obama going into PA was taking lots of heat. He needed to take the focus of the nation off of Wright, Rezco, and Bittergate. Therefore another story was needed for the media to go after. A sensational story.
Of course, this all assumes, among other things, that the informant is in fact in Obama’s camp.
bkmark. Thanks.
You said: “So what does this do for the validity of the case...? ... The roots of the tree may be poisoned, but the fruit was not.”
The “tree” refers to the good faith legal actions of the prosecutor, and not to the person making the allegations. The prosecutor investigated the complaint in good faith and obtained a properly executed warrant, based on what she understood to be true at the time. She did nothing illegal. The fact that the complainant lied does not change the legality of the search.
Common examples of “poisoned trees” would be warrantless searches, or searches based on a warrant which was procured as the result of a prosecutor who knowingly lied to the judge.
The “tree” refers to the good faith legal actions of the prosecutor, and not to the person making the allegations. The prosecutor investigated the complaint in good faith and obtained a properly executed warrant, based on what she understood to be true at the time. She did nothing illegal. The fact that the complainant lied does not change the legality of the search.
Common examples of “poisoned trees” would be warrantless searches, or searches based on a warrant which was procured as the result of a prosecutor who knowingly lied to the judge.
I have tried and tried to explain that to several of the FLDS supporters here and it just seems beyond their ability to understand, that and the difference between criminal and civil.
Good Job!
He is also a real drama queen, here is a little of his life story from attempting a lame girls type suicide, to visions, to dead people, to flirting with fundamental Mormonism himself, he seems to be something of a loser that found a cult to join.
http://www.lightplanet.com/mormons/testimonies/walsh_wj.htm
Thanks for the credit!
Oh, btw, I was the bride of one of those FLDS polygamists. /rimshot
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2004591/replies?c=33
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2004591/replies?c=71
I think the correct term is "Stupor Delegates".
Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.