Perhaps the bribery conviction of Former Gov. Don Siegelman (AL-DEM) was a miscarriage of justice; he has appealed. But...claiming Karl Rove had a role only serves to obfuscate the matter with misdirection. Usually, misdirection is a practice of the guilty.
To: ricks_place
At what point does this guys right to defend himself end for the convenience of former government officials?
To: ricks_place
...he wants former White House adviser Karl Rove to testify before Congress...Ya and the people in hell want ice water you jerk.
3 posted on
04/19/2008 10:13:02 AM PDT by
NurdlyPeon
(New tag line in progress.)
To: ricks_place
That's just an unnecessary partisan slander.
whether 'he lies under oath, tells the truth or pleads the Fifth.'
4 posted on
04/19/2008 10:15:37 AM PDT by
DManA
To: ricks_place
Usually, misdirection is a practice of the guilty. And, usually, Siegelman is guilty.
Of whatever he's been accused of doing...
6 posted on
04/19/2008 10:19:40 AM PDT by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
To: ricks_place
"Former Gov. Don Siegelman said Thursday that he wants former White House adviser Karl Rove to testify before Congress, whether 'he lies under oath, tells the truth or pleads the Fifth.'" Yeah...and I want (crook) Seigelman to explain if he still beats his wife or not. Thieving SOB belongs in prison.
9 posted on
04/19/2008 10:32:46 AM PDT by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: ricks_place
For Dems it is never about what you did wrong, but more why and how you got caught.
To: ricks_place
Is it legal for a governor to set up a lobby?
14 posted on
04/19/2008 11:20:33 AM PDT by
skr
(How majestic is Thy Name, O Lord, and how mighty are Thy Works!)
To: ricks_place
Siegelman is just throwing Rove’s name out there as a “dog whistle”, hoping the nutroots and their friends in DC (Conyers et al) and the media (Olbermann, Abrams) will hear the signal and come to his aid. And why wouldn’t they? After all, they all believe Rove is guilty of... well, pretty much everything really. Why wouldn’t they believe he’s responsible for Siegelman’s “wrongful” conviction as well?
18 posted on
04/19/2008 11:43:27 AM PDT by
Wade827
(Job 21:3)
To: ricks_place
Siegelman could steal a dollar from his mother's own pocket and get her blamed for it....
and probably would.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson