Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newly freed widow (Cynthia Sommer) of Marine may sue D.A. in San Diego
L A Times ^ | 04.19.08 | By Tony Perry, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

Posted on 04/19/2008 8:01:33 AM PDT by Perdogg

After 876 days in jail for a murder that prosecutors now say did not happen, Cynthia Sommer knew what she wanted: a fancy coffee drink at Starbucks, followed by a coconut-shrimp dinner at Bully's restaurant.

In the next few days, Sommer, 34, said at a Friday news conference, she plans to go shopping and spend time with her children. Her 16-year-old daughter was to reunite with her Friday night. She plans to travel to Michigan to see her three sons -- ages 8, 12 and 13.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: cynthiasommer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/19/2008 8:01:33 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Hmmmmm I am not really sure how I feel about this case, but I guess the DNA say she isn’t guilty, but maybe she knew who did it...

I don’t know, it’s just so sad to hear that we lost another hero and those kids have no father now


2 posted on 04/19/2008 8:04:08 AM PDT by Poetgal26 (God bless the US Military and our vets! (RIP Sgt Matthew Maupin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poetgal26

What really bothers me is soon after her husband dies she gets breasts implants. That seems so trashy to me, but it isn’t illegal.


3 posted on 04/19/2008 8:07:08 AM PDT by Perdogg (Reagan would have never said "She's my girl")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Yeah I totally agree on that one, thats why I was like omg you are so guilty...


4 posted on 04/19/2008 8:08:18 AM PDT by Poetgal26 (God bless the US Military and our vets! (RIP Sgt Matthew Maupin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Poetgal26
Hmmmmm I am not really sure how I feel about this case, but I guess the DNA say she isn’t guilty, but maybe she knew who did it...

I'm not sure what you mean by "who did it". She wasn't exonorated based on DNA testing. There's no clear indication that anyone did anything.

From the article:

When they had the new samples tested, experts could not find arsenic -- creating what Dumanis called reasonable doubt that Todd Sommer had died of arsenic poisoning.
(emphasis mine)
5 posted on 04/19/2008 8:10:51 AM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Poetgal26

It is thought to be a heart attack or reaction to diet pills.


6 posted on 04/19/2008 8:15:58 AM PDT by When do we get liberated? ((Ok, Im the official Pit Bull Defender/If you can't stand behind our troops, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: When do we get liberated?

Hmmmmm


7 posted on 04/19/2008 8:17:02 AM PDT by Poetgal26 (God bless the US Military and our vets! (RIP Sgt Matthew Maupin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: When do we get liberated?

BTW love your tagline!


8 posted on 04/19/2008 8:17:52 AM PDT by Poetgal26 (God bless the US Military and our vets! (RIP Sgt Matthew Maupin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Nifonging is apparently not peculiar to North Carolina.


9 posted on 04/19/2008 8:18:00 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Perhaps she felt inadequate and at 34 felt she had to do something to make herself attractive to find a new husband?

People do all kinds of things when they become desperate. I do not know what happened in this case but there could be a very good alternative to what the prosecution contended.


10 posted on 04/19/2008 8:38:42 AM PDT by dominic flandry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dominic flandry

I remember reading that she couldn’t party enough or have enough one night stands after her husband’s death and never grieved for him.

I used to watch Forensic Files all the time and there are numerous drugs that can’t be detected following death.

I don’t think she’s innocent but she will milk this although she is.


11 posted on 04/19/2008 8:59:43 AM PDT by quiet_reverie (http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/19476/donna_hope.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: quiet_reverie

==> “...there are numerous drugs that can’t be detected following death.” <==

Arsenic - a heavy metal element - is NOT one of them.


12 posted on 04/19/2008 9:29:38 AM PDT by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: abb

“Nifonging is apparently not peculiar to North Carolina.”

The prosecutors had a good case: a corpse full of arsenic, and a widow who started partying before the corpse was even cold. Now the arsenic has been called into doubt, and there is reasonable doubt of guilt. But the prosecutors deserve no insults, and Mrs Sommer has no case against them.


13 posted on 04/19/2008 10:10:51 AM PDT by devere (http://www.usmm.net/p2/thiswar.jpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Have you ever lost your spouse to a sudden death? Sometimes ya just got to get your mind on something else.

Not trashy at all, and certainly not a reason to falsely accuse a widow of murder.

14 posted on 04/19/2008 10:28:28 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: devere
I understand that new test proved that he didn't die from arsenic poising, but natural causes.
15 posted on 04/19/2008 10:30:53 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Seems to me she has a better case against the lab that performed the toxicology testing. It was negligent to allow the samples to become contaminated, and she certainly can show damages.

I am not sure how far she can get against the prosecutor. He probably has broad immunity. We need one of our FReeper lawyers to explain her chances.


16 posted on 04/19/2008 11:06:34 AM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MainFrame65

I didn’t say arsenic. I said that numerous drugs can’t be detected following death.


17 posted on 04/19/2008 11:34:35 AM PDT by quiet_reverie (http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/19476/donna_hope.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: abb

Our DA in San Diego is first class and a major professional.

Sommer is pushing her luck and her
situation isn’t finished yet.


18 posted on 04/19/2008 1:32:46 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Don't Blame Me - I Supported Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: quiet_reverie

You didn’t, but the article was titled, “She was jailed 876 days for an arsenic-poisoning murder that prosecutors now say didn’t occur.” And the article mentions arsenic and arsenic poisoning many times. If the lab found a false positive, all of their evidence is suspect because arsenic is not something subtle, like some easily degraded organic poisons.

Arsenic is a heavy metal chemical ELEMENT, easily detected and measured by simple lab techniques, and it would NEVER dissipate, dissolve, or change its nature over time. If Arsenic were present in the stomach, it would still be detectable in the cremated ashes.


19 posted on 04/19/2008 3:58:58 PM PDT by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: devere
Read the whole article: In response to a discovery motion by Bloom, Sommer's new defense attorney, prosecutors gathered all the tissue samples that had been taken from her husband's body, including some that were not tested before the first trial.

When they had the new samples tested, experts could not find arsenic -- creating what Dumanis called reasonable doubt that Todd Sommer had died of arsenic poisoning. An expert newly hired by the prosecution also suggested that earlier samples in which arsenic was found had been contaminated.




So, having evidence and information and not divulging it isn't grounds for a lawsuit? None of the so called sleeping around was proved, or even attempted to be proved, it was just hearsay and rumor, designed only to damage her character and poison the jury. As for the breast surgery, if you look, you can notice she didn't have an enlargement, she probably had them lifted, being that she had 4 kids at such a young age. I understand why she would do that.

Then, there's the question of why the Navy didn't take action to find out how Sgt. Sommer really did die, or were they afraid that they'd find one of their Doctor's made a mistake issuing a deadly prescription?
20 posted on 04/19/2008 5:20:06 PM PDT by papasmurf (Unless I post a link to resource, what I post is opinion, regardless of how I spin it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson