Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelican damages F-111 mid-flight
news.com.au ^ | April 19, 2008 | ames O'Loan and Alex Dickinson

Posted on 04/18/2008 6:37:23 PM PDT by Dundee

THIS "shredded" and incapacitated F-111 soared across southeast Queensland homes before a spectacular emergency landing at Amberley Air Base.

The jet was flying at 900m on a test bombing raid at Evans Head, northern NSW, when a pelican struck the fibreglass nose and was sucked into an engine...

The nation's air combat chief, Air Commodore Neil Hart, said the jet's predicament and "precautionary emergency landing" was not serious enough to alert the public...

"One engine was working fine, while the other was at reduced power."

He described the circumstances of the incident, which happened between 10am and noon, as near freakish. "It's a surprise thing at 3000ft to have a bird strike," he said.

"It's certainly not the way we want to operate all the time. The boys did a great job in getting it home."

Repairs to the F-111 – one of 21 active jets – are expected to cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Initially the pelican bounced off the nose before being sucked into an engine.

Its impact smashed the plane's ray-dome before causing an immediate engine failure.

The damaged aircraft is expected to be flying again within a month. The F-111 fleet, built in 1974, will be retired in 2010 when an expanded fleet of new Super Hornets is introduced.

At the time of the incident the F-111 was cruising at more than 550km/h. The Air Chief played down fears the flight path endangered homes across the region, though he conceded there were homes in the flight path.

The pilot and air combat officer in the plane were both "reasonably experienced" flight lieutenants, he said...

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; aviation; f111; noyinradome
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Eric in the Ozarks

Eric,

“Swingwing like the B-1?” No. Like the late great F-14 Tomcat. A McNamara era joint project to satisfy all the services nearly satisfied no one. By the time the Air Force added weight and complexity of mission to the origial TFX, it was too heavy for shipboard operations. The Navy developed the Tomcat and the Air Force the F-111.

Though the concept was for a big, fast, long-range multi-role fighter that could sweep its wings forward for dog-fighting manuverability, it never quite worked that way. The A.F. plane became a low-level nuclear capable all-weather terrain-following strike bomber. The Tomcat, despite the Tom Cruise movie, remained a stand-off fleet protecting interceptor that could engage multiple targets with its lookdown radar and Phoenix missle system.

I heard that in the end, the only things interchangeable in the two planes was the concept and the wing pivot structure.

Oldplayer


41 posted on 04/18/2008 8:07:36 PM PDT by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Went TDY to Northern Germany to repair a 111 while at Heyford.The Germans love aircraft and the German base commander asked the aircrew to do a high speed flyover when we were done.I think every German on that base came out to the flightline to see it.The 111 took off and did a max climb disapeared and maybe 30 seconds later you see a small speck then its bigger by the second then its by you,just below the speed of sound about 1000 ft above.I felt so proud of that crew and that old F111.


42 posted on 04/18/2008 8:09:08 PM PDT by noutopia (Home of the brave,not the spineless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dundee

My ship was in Darwin one year during the commemoration of the 1942 Japanese air raid. Two RAAF F-111s did a close flyby during which they dumped a bunch of fuel and then lit it with afterburners. Can’t remember the term for it but it was cool as hell to watch.


43 posted on 04/18/2008 8:15:51 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY (Your parents will all receive phone calls instructing them to love you less now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldplayer
The Tomcat, despite the Tom Cruise movie, remained a stand-off fleet protecting interceptor that could engage multiple targets with its lookdown radar and Phoenix missle system.

Until the last 10-12 years of its service when it got LANTIRN and took on the precision air to ground role with the retirement of the A-6.
44 posted on 04/18/2008 8:23:31 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dundee
Interesting article from last week about efforts to limit bird-related FOD to the 1st FW's F-22As:

www.af.mil

Biggest threat is that the local seagulls like to drop clams from altitude onto the runways and flightline.
45 posted on 04/18/2008 8:31:28 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
I worked What was once call Crash Recovery,then was changed to Repair and Reclamation.We were the guys that got the aircraft off the runway after an inflight emergency,also heavy maintenance like landing gears,wings,rudders,stabs.We would be out waiting for IFEs to land.In the distance at nite you could see the sky lite up with the crew dumping fuel and torching it off,looked strange.Wonder what the people that didnt know what was going on thought?
46 posted on 04/18/2008 8:36:08 PM PDT by noutopia (Home of the brave,not the spineless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
My ship was in Darwin one year during the commemoration of the 1942 Japanese air raid. Two RAAF F-111s did a close flyby during which they dumped a bunch of fuel and then lit it with afterburners. Can’t remember the term for it but it was cool as hell to watch.

Go to images.google.com and drop in the following:

"f-111" + "dump and burn"


47 posted on 04/18/2008 8:36:45 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

Your story is too funny. Flying F-4s out of Moody, Georgia in 79, I hit a Buzzard at 500 feet and 500 knots. Blew a huge hole in the front left of the canopy. Had a large very sharp piece poking me at the aft side of my left arm. That was it. It could have been much worse! Biggest problem after something like that is slowing down fast enough so you can actually communicate with the guy in the back. I can understand why a student would eject.


48 posted on 04/18/2008 8:45:56 PM PDT by LukeSW (The truth shall make you free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: krb
" Any landing you can walk away from... "
And it would make it handy to have a bar and a stiff drink near by, if he was not a drinker before hand, he will be now.
49 posted on 04/18/2008 8:46:31 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
Didn't they use these extensively during the Vietnam war ? correct me if I am wrong.
50 posted on 04/18/2008 8:48:14 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

That would be it. It was quite impressive.


51 posted on 04/18/2008 8:52:27 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY (Your parents will all receive phone calls instructing them to love you less now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LukeSW

Did your WSO know what had happened?


52 posted on 04/18/2008 8:52:59 PM PDT by noutopia (Home of the brave,not the spineless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: noutopia
I was going to ask if this was the fore runner of the F-14 Tomcat, but, the Tomcat has 2 vertical fins in the back.

53 posted on 04/18/2008 8:58:23 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

Pilots didnt trust the terain following radar.They tryed to override it and flew them into the dirt.They pulled them out of Nam.


54 posted on 04/18/2008 8:59:58 PM PDT by noutopia (Home of the brave,not the spineless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Tanknetter,

Thanks for the reminder. The first time I read about the new attack system mounted on the F-14, I just laughed to myself. What a versatile airplane the F-14 (with uprated engines) became.

Though still laughed at as “flying overcast”, the big bird was ready to protect our nation in many different ways. It is a tribute to the engineers, the factory assemblers, the pilots and the aircrews, that the plane was so very successful.

Oldplayer


55 posted on 04/18/2008 9:09:10 PM PDT by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

Sure can, I was a A-4 structural mech in Nam, they took a lot of punishment but a bird in the cockpit wasn’t part of it. I have seen them return with limbs and leaves in the wheel wells where the pilots would drop gear in order to get as slow as possible to place ord right on target.
Had one return with a hole in the wing you could stand up in.
VMA-223 Mag 12 Chu Lai RVN 66-68.
tet68


56 posted on 04/19/2008 3:25:10 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

In the mid 1950’s when I was about 7 years old, I was spending a few weeks down in Florida with my aunt and uncle. They’d just gotten a new Olds 98..with the big Rocket V-8..and we were driving through the Everglades...back then the road was a simple two lane blacktop...probably doing about 80-90 mph...when we smacked into a very low flying buzzard..cracked the windshield, came right through and ended up in their laps in the front seat. Mess of blood and guts. My uncle managed to stop the car straight..without driving into the water or rolling it. Troopers who responded said they’d never seen anything like it.


57 posted on 04/19/2008 3:46:55 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
I was going to ask if this was the fore runner of the F-14 Tomcat, but, the Tomcat has 2 vertical fins in the back.

Actually, the F-111 was the forerunner to the F-14. Under the TFX program GD was to produce the USAF strike/interdiction version, while Grumman produced the USN fleet defense interceptor.

The USN F-111B had a serious weight problem and poor deck handling qualities (although, in fairness, they did test the -B on the USS Coral Sea ... Tomcats never flew in operational service from the Midways - although some did go aboard on rare occasions). With the F-111B program failing Grumman did an unsolicited proposal to the Navy that used the same engines and the same weapons system (AWG-9) from the F-111B and leveraged the variable geometry technology Grumman had learned from into a brand-new airframe. This unsolicited proposal became the F-14 that we all know and love.
58 posted on 04/19/2008 4:34:42 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: CGTRWK

Perfect and most informative posting. I learned from the picture, too. Thanks.


59 posted on 04/19/2008 5:43:54 AM PDT by jws3sticks (Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Cyman
This one looks like it is full of rolled hay.

It is hay and its for insulation. Its cheaper than fiberglass and doesn't cause itching when you stuff it into the nose cone.........

60 posted on 04/19/2008 5:56:06 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson