Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dean: I need a decision 'now'(DNC Panic)
cnn Political Ticker ^ | April 17, 2008

Posted on 04/17/2008 6:20:23 PM PDT by Red Steel

(CNN)— An increasingly firm Howard Dean told CNN again Thursday that he needs superdelegates to say who they’re for – and “I need them to say who they’re for starting now.”

“We cannot give up two or three months of active campaigning and healing time,” the Democratic National Committee Chairman told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. “We’ve got to know who our nominee is.”

After facing criticism for a mostly hands-off leadership style during much of the primary season, Dean has been steadily raising the rhetorical pressure on superdelegates. He said Thursday that roughly 65 percent of them have made their preference plain, but that more than 300 have yet to make up their minds.

(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008dncconvention; dean; hillary; obama; superdelagates; superdelegates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Red Steel

This is so good. Who’d have thought a Dem nomination race could be so much fun?


21 posted on 04/17/2008 6:46:08 PM PDT by TheWasteLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bravada
Now might be the time to ask a question that keeps popping into my head. Do the superdelegates have opportunity to also vote in the primary elections in their states? I realize that a superdelegate vote (amazingly) carries more strength than a singular vote by themselves or anybody else, but even so, would they not be voting twice which would most certainly be illegal?

There's really no such thing as "illegal" when it comes to a political party determining its own candidate(s). They basically make up their own rules for themselves, and determine their candidate(s) however they want.

22 posted on 04/17/2008 6:46:46 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: redreno
Dem chickens done look like they come home to roost.

/johnny/

23 posted on 04/17/2008 6:46:46 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Bless us all, each, and every one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bravada
I realize that a superdelegate vote (amazingly) carries more strength than a singular vote by themselves or anybody else, but even so, would they not be voting twice which would most certainly be illegal?

Primaries are not elections. Parties make there own rules. Blue eyed people could vote twenty times if they chose to make their rules that way. Nothing illegal about it.

24 posted on 04/17/2008 6:47:26 PM PDT by SampleMan (We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Tanya K April 17th, 2008 6:18 pm ET
FELLOW DEMOCRATS
LET'S WORK TOGETHER I AM A HILLARY SUPPORTER, HOWEVER I WILL VOTE FOR OBAMA IN THE GE IF HE IS THE NOMINEE.
OUR COUNTRY CAN'T STAND ANOTHER BUSH TERM.

From your typical well-informed Dim voter.

25 posted on 04/17/2008 6:48:12 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (This is an Obama-nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheWasteLand

“This is so good. Who’d have thought a Dem nomination race could be so much fun?”

Not Hitlery, for damned sure. Gotta love it.


26 posted on 04/17/2008 6:48:32 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
“We cannot give up two or three months of active campaigning and healing time,” the Democratic National Committee Chairman told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. “We’ve got to know who our nominee is.”

Why is he telling this to Wolf Blitzer? Because the delegates aren't paying any attention to him?

27 posted on 04/17/2008 6:49:10 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Egads! What a situation! I always thought that even primary elections were governed under some kind of broader law. How did we come to this?


28 posted on 04/17/2008 6:50:19 PM PDT by Bravada (Wherever I Stand, I Stand With Israel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“One think she’s queen, the other thinks he’s the second coming....”

Thanks. I was afraid the choice was between antichrist A and antichrist B.

I thought he was the queen.


29 posted on 04/17/2008 6:50:56 PM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

After the lousy performance by the Democratic candidates Wednesday night, I can understand Dean’s panic. I’m getting fairly sick and tired of the 1960’s radicals, Howard Dean included, who occupy the Democratic Party. I would love to see the Dems lose the Presidential election, and Dean lose his job.


30 posted on 04/17/2008 6:50:57 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Unapologetically European)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
Someone should start using the disenfranchised word more. I don’t think Dems know what is happening to them.

Absolutely!
Hillary needs to steal the rat nomination. Can you imagine that? Buh-bye at least 20% of the permanent black Democrat "base", not to mention another 20% of the guilty-white-liberal Democrat "base". A Hillary nomination would castrate (no pun intended) the Democrat party for at least a decade.

31 posted on 04/17/2008 6:51:02 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
This is truly a weird primary. I’ve never seen anything like this.

It's the Clintons doing what they do best: trashing everything they touch.

32 posted on 04/17/2008 6:51:57 PM PDT by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

I know some Democrats in Michigan and Florida who were disenfranchised.


33 posted on 04/17/2008 6:53:04 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Unapologetically European)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

Tanya K likes to shout in all caps too. That must mean she is “really serious.” LOL


34 posted on 04/17/2008 6:53:16 PM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bravada

The primary system needs to be changed to prevent Iowa and New Hampshire from picking our candidates, and the national party committees should be told to butt out. Who is Howard Dean to tell Michigan and Florida when to vote, or that their delegates won’t be seated. Elections are governed by State law. Add in all the idiot quotas that Dems have, and the national party gets to pick all the delegates.


35 posted on 04/17/2008 6:57:53 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Unapologetically European)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
Precisely. Dean is his usual ham-handed self with this one - "Who cares what the voters in ten states think? I want a candidate and I want one now!" Thanks, Howie. "Disenfranchised" - I like the sound of the word. BTT.
36 posted on 04/17/2008 6:58:40 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bravada

In truth, you don’t want the government regulating parties. If you want to form a political party tomorrow, which selects candidates based on their place in the phone book, that should be your right. Remember, no one is forced to join your party.


37 posted on 04/17/2008 7:00:13 PM PDT by SampleMan (We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I thought he wanted them committed by June 1 (and yes, I think that they should ALL be committed, but that’s another story ;’}...you’re right - he IS in a panic!


38 posted on 04/17/2008 7:00:57 PM PDT by rockrr (Global warming is to science what Islam is to religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bravada
Egads! What a situation! I always thought that even primary elections were governed under some kind of broader law. How did we come to this?

It's always been this way. I've been involved in a couple of lawsuits over primary politics and the judges in each case have said that the courts have historically stayed out of the workings of the parties because they are private organizations. We could make up a FReeper party and let JimRob choose our candidate. It would be perfectly legal.

39 posted on 04/17/2008 7:01:22 PM PDT by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

CHAOS


40 posted on 04/17/2008 7:01:39 PM PDT by Rosemont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson