[ketsu]

You directly referred to the easily debunked Miller/Urey experiment when I referred to the line about lightning in the article, thereby exposing your ignorance:

Now i`ve educated you as to the why of Miller/Urey and of the flaw of prebiotic protein evolution.

The probability of finding a functional protein among the possible amino acid sequences corresponding to a 150-residue protein is similarly 1 in 10 to the 77 power.(Axe 2004)

I`m bored with the likes of simplistic neo-darwinists such as yourself who always presume much and know little.

Adios. :rolleyes: You can't think with any degree of rigor can you? *You're* the one that brought up proteins(not amino acids, a claim much easier to verify) exposing yourself as a. ignorant or b. dishonest. Actually I'm going for a and b. You're stupid *and* dishonest.

[Para-Ord.45]

“You’re the one that brought up proteins(not amino acids, a claim much easier to verify) “

Once more, you cannot argue the merits of evolution without explanation as to how , unaided, a protein manufactured itself. Your obfuscation led you to toss AAs at me in hopes I`d simply run away in fear. I dismissed your Miller/Urey/prebiotic nonsense with ease.

Now, when will the atheist/darwinists prove a single protein arose unaided.Even if you could,which you cannot,it would probably be one single, isolated, worthless protein, which would quickly fall apart in the presence of water or ultraviolet light from the sun.

Without the first protein there is no evolution.