“You’re the one that brought up proteins(not amino acids, a claim much easier to verify) “
Once more, you cannot argue the merits of evolution without explanation as to how , unaided, a protein manufactured itself. Your obfuscation led you to toss AAs at me in hopes I`d simply run away in fear. I dismissed your Miller/Urey/prebiotic nonsense with ease.
Now, when will the atheist/darwinists prove a single protein arose unaided.Even if you could,which you cannot,it would probably be one single, isolated, worthless protein, which would quickly fall apart in the presence of water or ultraviolet light from the sun.
Without the first protein there is no evolution.
Once more, you cannot argue the merits of evolution without explanation as to how , unaided, a protein manufactured itself. Your obfuscation led you to toss AAs at me in hopes I`d simply run away in fear. I dismissed your Miller/Urey/prebiotic nonsense with ease.Yawn... now you're making something resembling an argument. First, I haven't made any arguments(other than pointing out your dishonesty for conflating proteins and amino acids). The voices in your head don't count.Now, when will the atheist/darwinists prove a single protein arose unaided.Even if you could,which you cannot,it would probably be one single, isolated, worthless protein, which would quickly fall apart in the presence of water or ultraviolet light from the sun.
Without the first protein there is no evolution.
Second, evolution is *science*. Science is *empirical*. Do you even know what empiricism is?
Without the first water molecule, there is no weather. Meteorological theories are therefore false. Hence, weathermen are atheists.