Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Para-Ord.45
Once more, you cannot argue the merits of evolution without explanation as to how , unaided, a protein manufactured itself. Your obfuscation led you to toss AAs at me in hopes I`d simply run away in fear. I dismissed your Miller/Urey/prebiotic nonsense with ease.

Now, when will the atheist/darwinists prove a single protein arose unaided.Even if you could,which you cannot,it would probably be one single, isolated, worthless protein, which would quickly fall apart in the presence of water or ultraviolet light from the sun.

Without the first protein there is no evolution.

Yawn... now you're making something resembling an argument. First, I haven't made any arguments(other than pointing out your dishonesty for conflating proteins and amino acids). The voices in your head don't count.

Second, evolution is *science*. Science is *empirical*. Do you even know what empiricism is?

116 posted on 04/17/2008 7:03:45 PM PDT by ketsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: ketsu

“...other than pointing out your dishonesty for conflating proteins and amino acids”

Neither dishonesty nor conflating taking place, only discomfiture on your part in proving Ben Stein`s point.

Now that we`ve conclusivley proven that you neo-darwinists dare not debate how life could evolve without the first protein let us now disassemble the simplistic theory using their own words.

According to Darwin`s own theory, millions and millions of transitional fossils should have been discovered, yet there is none.
As Darwin himself admitted,” The number of intermediate varieties which have formerly existed on Earth must be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory.”

If continual morphing were occuring EVERY fossil would demonstrate change with many more showing bizarre useless growths leading to nothing since mutations in animal and plant germ cells are neutral, harmful, or fatal.

Natural selection process being random trial and error, without direction,cannot be 100% neutral.

Where are all the failed mutated fossils?


182 posted on 04/17/2008 10:38:02 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson