” you realize we’re talking about *your* assertion that evolutionists believe that fully formed proteins come from lightning. So you agree you were lying/ignorant? “
You directly referred to the easily debunked Miller/Urey experiment when I referred to the line about lightning in the article, thereby exposing your ignorance:
” You’re the one conflating the electricity experiments(which successfully generated amino acids) and prebiotic protein evolution. “
Now i`ve educated you as to the why of Miller/Urey and of
the flaw of prebiotic protein evolution.
The probability of finding a functional protein among the possible amino acid sequences corresponding to a 150-residue protein is similarly 1 in 10 to the 77 power.(Axe 2004)
I`m bored with the likes of simplistic neo-darwinists such as yourself who always presume much and know little.
Adios.
Now i`ve educated you as to the why of Miller/Urey and of the flaw of prebiotic protein evolution.
The probability of finding a functional protein among the possible amino acid sequences corresponding to a 150-residue protein is similarly 1 in 10 to the 77 power.(Axe 2004)
I`m bored with the likes of simplistic neo-darwinists such as yourself who always presume much and know little.
Adios. :rolleyes: You can't think with any degree of rigor can you? *You're* the one that brought up proteins(not amino acids, a claim much easier to verify) exposing yourself as a. ignorant or b. dishonest. Actually I'm going for a and b. You're stupid *and* dishonest.