[MrB]

Oh, I see, you’re trying to say that anyone who pursues the investigation wherever it leads and ends up at the Creator conclusion MUST have had a close minded theological approach to the research.

See the “PC liberal” section in the article. There’s the PC liberal “enlightened” side, and no other side need be considered.

[ketsu]

Oh, I see, you’re trying to say that anyone who pursues the investigation wherever it leads and ends up at the Creator conclusion MUST have had a close minded theological approach to the research.

See the “PC liberal” section in the article. There’s the PC liberal “enlightened” side, and no other side need be considered.

All this blithering about logical necessity isn't scientific. Perhaps you should learn more about the scientific method?

[allmendream]

Oh, excuse me. I should take seriously a “If evolution were true why wouldn't a dog give birth to a cow or a cat?” question? I should perhaps applaud their knowledge and astute observation of this JackChick-like strawman of evolution?

It is as stupid a question as “If gravity were true how come the moon doesn't fall into the Earth?”. Try that one on a Physicist or Astronomer and see how much respect you get.