Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stuttering Democrats
American Spectator ^ | 4-17-08 | Philip Klein

Posted on 04/17/2008 1:36:00 AM PDT by kingattax

PHILADELPHIA -- Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton squared off last night in a debate to help Democrats choose their party's nominee, but the big winner wasn't either Democrat. It was Republican John McCain.

Both Clinton and Obama were rattled as ABC moderators Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopolous grilled them on a number of issues that have not been brought into focus before.

Clinton came across as craven and dishonest, while the normally eloquent Obama buckled under tough questioning about his relationships with former Weather Underground member Bill Ayers and Rev. Jeremiah Wright. When the debate moved to policy, both candidates contradicted themselves repeatedly and revealed the hollowness of their liberal positions.

Gibson reminded Obama that more than a year ago he asked Wright not to attend the announcement of his candidacy, reportedly telling his long-time pastor, "You can get kind of rough in sermons. So, what we've decided is that it's best for you not to be out there in public." Gibson then asked Obama why, knowing Wright was "rough in sermons," it took him more than a year to distance himself from the remarks.

Obama responded unconvincingly, saying that even though he had a close relationship with Wright that spanned decades, it wasn't until he read an article in Rolling Stone that he found out that the reverend had delivered inflammatory sermons, and that it wasn't until he saw YouTube clips that he was aware of Wright's even more explosive comments.

But in last month's highly touted race speech, Obama said: "Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes."

So which is it?

Meanwhile, Obama declared that because Wright served as a Marine, "I believe that he loves this country." I'd wager that most Americans who listened to Wright shout, "God damn America" would come to a different conclusion.

When Obama was asked a question about his relationship with domestic terrorist Ayers, he made the outlandish parallel to his friendship with conservative Sen. Tom Coburn, who is a fierce opponent of abortion.

And Obama also had a telling response when asked about his uneasiness about wearing an American flag lapel pin.

"This is the kind of manufactured issue that our politics has become obsessed with and, once again, distracts us from what should be my job when I'm commander in chief, which is going to be figuring out how we get our troops out of Iraq and how we actually make our economy better for the American people," Obama said.

It was quite indicative of how he views his job as commander in chief that he describes it only in terms of leaving Iraq rather than protecting America. Even if somebody believes that withdrawing from Iraq is a necessary precondition to securing our nation, it is certainly a bizarre way to define the role of leading the armed forces of the largest military of the world.

Clinton didn't fare any better when, by video, a voter asked about her fantastical recreation of her visit to Bosnia in 1996.

"I can tell you that I may be a lot of things. But I'm not dumb," Clinton said. "On a couple of occasions in the last weeks, I just said some things that weren't in keeping with what I knew to be the case and what I had written about in my book."

Well there's a word for when intelligent people say things that they know not to be true. It's called: lying. I'm surprised she never learned this from her grandfather who worked in the lace mills in Scranton.

THE CANDIDATES' PERFORMANCES did not improve once the subject moved on to policy.

Clinton, at first, committed to withdrawing one or two brigades a month from Iraq upon taking office, no matter the realities on the ground. But then she said she would, upon taking office, ask her security advisers, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Secretary of Defense to draw up plans to begin a pullout within 60 days. "I will make it very clear that we will do so in a responsible and careful manner because, obviously, withdrawing troops and equipment, is dangerous."

But what if her advisers tell her that withdrawing one or two brigades a month isn't responsible, would she override them?

"No one can predict what will happen," Clinton said. "There are many different scenarios."

But what if one of these unpredictable scenarios occurs? Will she still withdraw troops at the same pace? And who's on first?

Obama, meanwhile, gave a more coherent response to this question, that the president sets the mission, which the military commanders then follow. But when it came to Iran, the golden-tongued Obama sounded like Elmer Fudd.

When asked by Stephanopolous whether America should treat an Iranian attack on Israel as an attack on the United States, Obama dodged the question with boilerplate about the need to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, before eventually arriving at, "that would be an act of aggression that we would -- that I would consider an attack that is unacceptable. And the United States would take appropriate action."

Yeah Barack, that ought to show them!

On domestic policy, both candidates tried to slither their way out of past anti-gun rights positions, and explain their myriad plans to raise taxes.

Asked why he would consider nearly doubling capital gains taxes even though historically revenue has gone up from lowering the rates, Obama got flustered.

"Well, that might happen, or it might not," Obama said. "It depends on what's happening on Wall Street and how business is going." He then went off on a tangent about President Bush and McCain being inattentive to the housing crisis.

Clinton also said she would consider raising the capital gains tax, only not by as much as Obama.

And then Obama, despite minutes earlier saying he wouldn't raise taxes on individuals earning less than $200,000, said he would consider raising the cap on payroll taxes, which would mean a tax hike for anybody earning more than $97,000.

It may very well be that with an unpopular incumbent president in office, a controversial war, and an uncertain economy, the deck is just too stacked against Republicans this election year for them to retake the White House. And McCain no doubt has his own weaknesses as a candidate. But the Democrats sure did look beatable Wednesday night.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: demdebates; hillary; obama; operationchaos; pa2008; tas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: RushLake
Hmm, "The" reverund wrong was a Marine. So were Lee Harvey Oswald and the UT tower shooter of about 30 years ago. Something else I'm sure they all have in common--the USMC is probably most assuredly not proud of their association. Better they earned a posthumous Purple Heart then their post USMC noteriety.

Well put. Semper fi.
41 posted on 04/17/2008 3:48:41 AM PDT by TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
I'd wager that most Americans who listened to Wright shout, "God damn America" would come to a different conclusion.

McPain campaign ad (if Obambi's the candidate). Split screen. Jerimiah Wright..."God Damn America". Pope Benedict...."God Bless America". Nothing else.

42 posted on 04/17/2008 4:01:41 AM PDT by jslade (People who are easily offended......OFFEND ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kakaze
Your #27 should get the FR equivalent of a bronze plaque in a prominent place. The Clintons' arrogance has long been remarkable, but B. Hussein O.'s arrogance is, if anything, even worse (particularly given his extraordinary lack of accomplishment in any field aside from manufacturing images).

Mr. niteowl77

43 posted on 04/17/2008 4:05:54 AM PDT by niteowl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Asked why he would consider nearly doubling capital gains taxes even though historically revenue has gone up from lowering the rates, Obama got flustered.

The debate was a wonderful thing to watch. I enjoyed watching Hillary and Obama try to answer some of those tough questions...

44 posted on 04/17/2008 4:08:32 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

I guess I am not so shocked he would scuttle Obama. Stephi was a long time Clinton spokesperson, pres .secrtary, and he owes his career to the Clintons. It is hardly shocking he would try to sink Obama and hand her the RAT Party nomination in his last best shot. as Carville would say this is WAAAAAR.


45 posted on 04/17/2008 4:12:03 AM PDT by rod1 (uestion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
Hmm, "The" reverund wrong was a Marine. So were Lee Harvey Oswald and the UT tower shooter of about 30 years ago. Something else I'm sure they all have in common--the USMC is probably most assuredly not proud of their association. Better they earned a posthumous Purple Heart then their post USMC noteriety.

I was going to add Jack Murtha to that list, but that would be an insult to Oswald and the UT tower shooter.

46 posted on 04/17/2008 4:13:58 AM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

They both sounded pretty stupid but I didn’t see anything that is going to derail Hussein’s march to the nomination. Hillary was toast before the debate, she’s still toast after the debate.

I used to think I wanted more of a dimowit fight for the nomination, that it would be better if Hillary were strong enough to have a real shot.

But after watching last night, and seeing how stupid Hussein looks, I’m fine with Hillary going down in flames relatively early (probably in the next 30 days).

It’s nice to see the Annointed Queen end up in the gutter.

Very nice indeed.


47 posted on 04/17/2008 4:15:46 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority

“She couldn’t even get Bill to pull out of Monica. “

That’s hitting below the belt. /rimshot


48 posted on 04/17/2008 4:22:39 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Shouldn't the libs love a Hunter Thompson ticket in 08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

“Wasn’t Lee Harvey Oswald a Marine too? “

And he shot a Democrat President. Let’s not go too hard on the guy.

/kidding. It’s a joke Mr. O’Reilly.


49 posted on 04/17/2008 4:26:06 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Shouldn't the libs love a Hunter Thompson ticket in 08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Before the the debate last night I had a hard time believing that anyone who votes for either of the dems is sane.

After last night anyone who votes for Obama or Mrs. Clinton just confirms their insanity. Is was an absolute pathetic "performance" and awful scary at the prospects of two bumbling liars/deceivers at the helm.

What do the voters desire? Tyrants? Oppression? Very discouraging at the amount of people who will be voting FOR Obama or Clinton in the general election. But then again Repubs don't make it easy to vote their way.

50 posted on 04/17/2008 4:26:33 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rollo tomasi

“What do the voters desire? “

After 8 years of listening to the mediacrats bash Bush, apparently anything but Bush.

Which is why Hekyll and Jekyll are running neck and neck.

We really do need Al Gore to enter the race. Just for the entertainment value.


51 posted on 04/17/2008 4:29:38 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Shouldn't the libs love a Hunter Thompson ticket in 08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Just means more and more that obaMA is one scary mofo.


52 posted on 04/17/2008 4:31:48 AM PDT by babyfreep (If you see a snake poised to strike, you do not wait until he has struck before you crush him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
meat-head murtha was a Marine... but they disowned him.

LLS

53 posted on 04/17/2008 4:35:22 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Could I ever vote for mcstain? osamabama hussein may convince me yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
“Wasn't Lee Harvey Oswald a Marine too?”

So was that prick who killed his pregnant rape victim and burned her body in his backyard.

Tim McVeigh was a veteran from the first Gulf War.

Dims are liars and stupid.

54 posted on 04/17/2008 4:36:17 AM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: panthermom
Obama is evil in my opinion, worse than Hillary.

I agree whole heartedly!

55 posted on 04/17/2008 4:48:34 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: babyfreep

He has said the exact same thing before in speeches and interviews.


56 posted on 04/17/2008 4:51:13 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Meanwhile, Obama declared that because Wright served as a Marine, “I believe that he loves this country.” I’d wager that most Americans who listened to Wright shout, “God damn America” would come to a different conclusion.

As a former active Marine I wanted to scream at the tube SO WAS LEE HARVEY OSWALD and JACK MURTHA!!!!!


57 posted on 04/17/2008 5:30:05 AM PDT by lakeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushLake

Uhrah


58 posted on 04/17/2008 5:34:05 AM PDT by lakeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

I told my son the grown-ups of the USA will not be voting in a democrat this fall. Grown-ups meaning Americans be they democrat republican or other.


59 posted on 04/17/2008 5:38:27 AM PDT by lakeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

They always talk about the “Right to bear arm” but always leave out the “Shall not be infringed”


60 posted on 04/17/2008 5:40:36 AM PDT by lakeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson