Posted on 04/16/2008 11:13:47 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
If Barack Obama is looking for proof there are indeed bitter Americans out there, he need look no further than across the kitchen table . . .
Morning Joe opened today with a clip of Michelle Obama on the stump that I can only call stunning. By her tone, and her language both verbal and physical, this is one angry lady. The transcript below doesn't begin to convey Mrs. Obama's apparent rage.
I urge people to view the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
No they have found some wiggers and brain dead white trash as supporters. Those sheeple will kinldy have their throats cut after assisting Obuma into the Whitehouse by Obuma’s NOI staff.
Fools will always be fools.
Sho Nuff,
NSNR
Is that what she said? I heard this.
I want people to know when they loog at me, ta be clear that they SEE what a invessmen in pubic ejacation can look like.
That woman needs some serious public speaking coaching on her accent, diction and enunciation. Even the white woman journalist was incredulous at her attitude.
All I have to say ... what a racist bitch with an attitude.
Hair envy?Yeah,thats a good possibility since most black women like long straight hair rather than short naturals which are my preference.
Hey PKE,
M.O. is a perfect example of the teachings of Rev Half-White-Wright from the pulpit to the tomb.
M.O. is full of hatred, racism and anti-Americanism.
I think M.O. would be an excellent Mau Mau leader in my opinion.
I will never cut Obuma or Mochelle any slack, that’s a fact.
Well Hush My Mouth,
NSNR
I agree. I think Sherry Harper Belfonte’s look is very flattering. Then again, she’s a stunningly beautiful woman with great bone structure, and can get away with having such short hair.
Michelle was cute, natural and effective in that video in my opinion.
That being said, I think she and her husband are lothsome.
Yeah, maybe I'm one of those "typical white people" her husband was talking about.
I was making fun of her because she was talkin' to people on purpose. You KNOW she doesn't talk like that when she is acting as a lawyer. She was putting on an act.
Watch the video. She actually does say "talkin" and "let me tell you who me and Barak are." She says she in the product of a working class upbringin'. (Notice she forgot to drop the 'g' on 'working' but she did remember to do it on 'upbringin'. She says she wants people to look at her and "see what an investment in public education should look like." Gee, if that's how she really talks, we got a bad deal.
I guess my post was too subtle.
Brenda Sykes was a Seventies movie star who had that look as did Cicely Tyson at the beginning of her career.
LOL...
Flat-out lies or welfare fraud. Hmmm.
I never thought that I would see a spouse of a presidential candidate who was more of a radical, narcissistic, arrogant, hubristic, self-entitled, and maddening solipsist than Hilary Clinton. To the nations dismay, I think we have found her in Michelle Obama. She is the loose cannon Benito Mussolini face of liberal fascism that Barack Hussein Obama is so careful to hide. Barack Obama is more practiced at keeping the mask up. But in the liberal Hyde Park ghetto that she lives in Chicago, attending cocktail parties with her coterie of liberal U of C academics, Black South Side DemonRat pols, public sector sinecures, NGO flacks and liberal Sun Times columnists, EVERBODY she knows thinks and feels this way.
Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obamas resentments toward her country and its citizens were undoubtedly nourished by the effect that her set-aside affirmative action appointment to Princeton had on her. It would appear that she was unable to reconcile her black cultural nationalist/separatist philosophy with her tenure at Princeton, a place for which she was wholly unsuited by dint of preparation and talent, if her poorly written senior thesis is any indication. Rather than appreciating the AA slack cut her by the lib profs, she chose to lash out at what she saw as condescension and maybe some pity from them. She felt that she didnt belong and she probably didnt, but her racial sensitivity antenna read racism and bigotry rather that contemptuous pity. Her artificially inflated ego couldnt stand that and she has mutated an enormous shoulder chip ever since.
Now we can only hope that the Barack He who must not be middle named Obama campaign does not muzzle her and deprive the GOP of a priceless asset. Bur from what I hear that is a dangerous proposition for any worker in that campaign. She appears to be as unmanageable and ornery as the Hildabeast.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/JC04Aa01.html
Heck, in the area (San Francisco Bay Area), liberals were trying to force Ebonics to be considered on a par with French, Spanish and German in the classroom. And to have its own separate funding, just like another language.
So, in the worldview of a Sanfrancisco Liberal: If Michelle speaks ghetto and English -- that means she speaks two languages!
Michelle reflects the attitudes and beliefs of her pastor.
She had to use “me” instead of “I” because otherwise she would have been accused of ‘acting white”.
Its called”shape shifting”and I know plenty of folks who can do it on cue.
Regarding the whole Ebonics controversy,I think many get confused.It was not to TEACH Ebonics to black kids-here in Oakland,most kids know how to speak it all too well.The idea was to get the white teachers to RECOGNIZE ghetto speech patterns so that they could gently correct the kids and get them to use proper English without shaming them in the process.
I saw nothing wrong with that approach but after fifteen years,walk into any school in this town and most all the kids are not speaking the King’s English.They are speaking Ebonics!
Maybe we need another tax assessment to straighten the situation out.
NOT!
And all I could think at the time was: 1) what a waste, and 2) yeah, right -- Esperanto was such a great idea too, not.
The outcry against Ebonics being taught was a big deal in the SF Bay Area, and plans to recognize it as a formal "language" was shelved.
The School Educrats were putting it the same light as they were Spanish for Spanish speaking immigrants. And yes, there were published texts, fiction and non-fiction.
I understand yours on "getting the white teachers to recognize ghetto speech patterns, and there is something to that. But to "formalize" Ebonics is to encourage its use and can never be useful as a corrective. It will only hobble Ebonics speaking students nationally and internationally and put these students behind the curve farther than where they were starting from.
Of course, that is why the Black Liberation Theology and the marxists teachers in the schools/universities.
This racism, hatred of whites, and anti-Americanism is the old radical black panther mindset of the 60’s.
Many of the black marxist islamic sympathizers have always used the pulpit to preach their agenda of hate and anti-Americanism. These black Imam’s congregants are willfully brain washed by this rhetoric.
Of course when composed of only 15% of the USA population and with 5% not in agreement. I myself do not think it would be wise for the Mau Mau(s) to start a violent revolution in America.
If Obuma gets elected, which I pray to God he will not, then you will see the marxist agenda being downloaded on America.
Patriotic Americans will not stand by and let our rights be taken away by Obuma the (Global Candidate) who refuses to wear an American Flag lapel pin and place his right hand over his heart when pledging allegiance to our “Great American Flag.”
McCain will trounce either shrillary or Obuma in the general election.
Respectfully,
NSNR
placemark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.