Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

I will admit that I am troubled by random checkpoints, not so much because of the fourth amendment violation—I’m not so sure that the temporary seizure rises to the level of a constitutional violation (but maybe it does)—but more from a fifth amendment self-incrimination standpoint. I really don’t buy into the “implied consent” argument, but on the other hand, I really don’t see any other workable way around the problem.

For instance, I think that were police to be barred from using DWI checkpoints, I think that police would be much more inclined to stop drivers for trivial violations—especially on Friday or Saturday nights, say—which would increase costs for the rest of society. Clearly these would be “sham” stops, and I’m not sure that’s better policy. Do you?


65 posted on 04/17/2008 5:14:22 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Publius Valerius
I will admit that I am troubled by random checkpoints, not so much because of the fourth amendment violation—I’m not so sure that the temporary seizure rises to the level of a constitutional violation (but maybe it does)—but more from a fifth amendment self-incrimination standpoint. I really don’t buy into the “implied consent” argument, but on the other hand, I really don’t see any other workable way around the problem.

For instance, I think that were police to be barred from using DWI checkpoints, I think that police would be much more inclined to stop drivers for trivial violations—especially on Friday or Saturday nights, say—which would increase costs for the rest of society. Clearly these would be “sham” stops, and I’m not sure that’s better policy. Do you?

geez man, IF it were about public safety, you might have an argument [un Constitutional as it is]...

The last 'checkpoint' I encountered the cop asked me 3 times in three different ways if I had been drinking...we both had a questioning feel about the others face, when he remembered that we formerly worked for the same company a couple years earlier [during his trainee period] he IMMEDIATELY said 'have a safe trip' and sent me on my way...

Q?...how many cops get dui unless they are involved in an accident???

70 posted on 04/17/2008 7:11:16 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Choose Liberty over slavery... the gulag awaits ANY compromise with evil...LiveFReeOr Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Publius Valerius
. . . but on the other hand, I really don’t see any other workable way around the problem.

What exactly is "the problem" here?

For instance, I think that were police to be barred from using DWI checkpoints, I think that police would be much more inclined to stop drivers for trivial violations -- especially on Friday or Saturday nights, say -- which would increase costs for the rest of society. Clearly these would be "sham" stops, and I’m not sure that’s better policy. Do you?

Why would the police need to do anything at all? In most metro areas there are enough incompetent drivers to keep any police force busy pulling people over for legitimate offenses and writing them tickets all day long.

71 posted on 04/17/2008 7:57:21 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson