Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Angry wife tries divorce-by-YouTube tactic
AP ^ | 04/15/2008 | JOCELYN NOVECK

Posted on 04/16/2008 6:51:25 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd

NEW YORK (AP) — We're the YouTube Generation, living in the YouTube Era, in a YouTube World. And now we apparently have a YouTube Divorce.

Some prominent New York divorce lawyers couldn't think of another case where a spouse — in this instance, the wife of a major Broadway theater operator — had taken to YouTube to spill the secrets of a marriage in an apparent effort to gain leverage and humiliate the other side.

"This is absolutely a new step, and I think it's scary," said Bonnie Rabin, a divorce lawyer who has handled high-profile cases. "People used to worry about getting on Page Six (the gossip page of the New York Post.) But this? It brings the concept of humiliation to a whole new level."

In a tearful and furious YouTube video with close to 150,000 hits to date, former actress and playwright ("Bonkers") Tricia Walsh-Smith lashes out against her husband, Philip Smith, president of the Shubert Organization, the largest theater owner on Broadway.

She goes through their wedding album on camera, describing family members as "bad" or "evil" or "nasty," and talks about how her husband is allegedly trying to evict her from their luxury apartment. She also makes embarrassing claims regarding their intimate life, and then calls his office on camera to repeat those claims to a stunned assistant.

Famed divorce attorney Raoul Felder, called for comment on the video, termed the whole thing "funny, but there's also sadness. This is a victim who is holding her head up. I think she comes off well."

Then again, Felder allowed that he is now representing Walsh-Smith — though he wasn't when she made the YouTube video.

As for Smith, his office said he had no comment and his lawyers said they didn't, either — "other than that we're kind of appalled."

"I don't think it's the kind of thing people should be doing, and it's the kind of thing judges frown upon," said Norman Sheresky, a partner in the matrimonial law firm Sheresky Aronson Mayesfsky & Sloan, which Walsh-Smith mentions in her video. Asked if he had ever seen a spouse use YouTube to fire a salvo in a divorce battle, Sherefsky replied, "Jamais de la vie." (Translation: Never.)

Felder explained that his client was "acting out of passion." He also called the prenuptial agreement she'd signed with her husband, who is a quarter-century older than her, "stupid."

So why did his client sign? "Why do women sign these things? Love is blind, and sometimes it is deaf and dumb, too," Felder said. The video, he added, was the act of a powerless person, and "revolutions are made by powerless people."

Does that mean divorce-by-YouTube is a true revolution? Rabin, the matrimonial lawyer, sure hopes not.

For one thing, she says, this could come back to haunt Walsh-Smith. "Judges make decisions partly on (a person's) judgment," she says. "She could hurt herself with this." Not to mention the threat of a defamation case from the other side.

More broadly, she asks, where does it end? "Over the last few years we've had to deal with emails getting into the press, emails that nobody thought would end up as Exhibit A. But throwing your secrets onto YouTube for the whole world to see — and comment on! That brings it to a whole new level."

Or, in Felder's words: "There's no such thing as a private life anymore."


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: divorce; lifetimechannel; youtube
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Her nick-name is Bonkers. How appropriate.
1 posted on 04/16/2008 6:51:26 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Why didn’t you post a link to the YouTube video???


2 posted on 04/16/2008 6:57:28 AM PDT by Fawn (Judge Judy Rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson; mikrofon
In a tearful and furious YouTube video with close to 150,000 hits to date, former actress and playwright ("Bonkers") Tricia Walsh-Smith

(No, its not really her. Inside joke.)

3 posted on 04/16/2008 7:00:13 AM PDT by martin_fierro ("We're kind of appalled.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Whatever. YouTube is so pathetic. A bunch of self-centered people pasting themselves up in shlock and wholly vacuous videos. YouTube is a nearly a complete wasteland.


4 posted on 04/16/2008 7:00:14 AM PDT by Obadiah (I dream of the day when chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

Here ya go!
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=hx_WKxqQF2o


5 posted on 04/16/2008 7:02:17 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am very mad at Disney. Give me my James Marsden song!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
"Angry wife tries divorce-by-YouTube tactic"

Looking forward to the day when Shrillary tries this route...... :^)

This has all kinds of possibilities..... imagine if Monica (or Kathleen Willey or Gennifer Flowers or Paula Jones or......) had had YouTube available back in the day.....?
6 posted on 04/16/2008 7:02:36 AM PDT by Enchante (Obama: You dumb ignorant "typical white people" should learn to say "God D--n America!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd; JRios1968

GENTLEMEN OF THE JURY, HOW DO YE FIND?

("Bonkers!")

7 posted on 04/16/2008 7:02:37 AM PDT by martin_fierro ("We're kind of appalled.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
I understand she'll be represented in court by Billiam The Snowman from the CNN You Tube Democratic debate.


8 posted on 04/16/2008 7:03:39 AM PDT by edpc (Republican Attack Machine Field Service Technician)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

GUILTY.

She’s got those Runaway Bride eyes.

Creepy!


9 posted on 04/16/2008 7:04:21 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Typical White Person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Guilty. Here's another picture of her, still smiling; but with a little less eyeliner.......


10 posted on 04/16/2008 7:07:23 AM PDT by edpc (Republican Attack Machine Field Service Technician)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

OH MY GOSH! Have you watched the video? I could only get about 3 minutes into it...She is a whack job. She hurt herself more by doing this. Any judge will see this woman for what she is...a gold-digging NUTJOB. I think she was drunk...

Ah...modern times...


11 posted on 04/16/2008 7:08:44 AM PDT by Hildy (Obama: "Yes, I sat in his church, but I didn't inhale.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

bookmark. watch this at home tonight.


12 posted on 04/16/2008 7:08:56 AM PDT by Lurking in Kansas (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down t heir level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

First time I’ve ever seen a blonde raccoon.


13 posted on 04/16/2008 7:09:23 AM PDT by LIConFem (Thompson. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter Lifetime ACU Rating: 92 (any combo will do, fellas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

I agree! I made it through only a few minutes myself. It makes her look REALLY bad.

Although I do like the comment where the poster says, “Finish your beer and pass out, Lady”!


14 posted on 04/16/2008 7:10:40 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am very mad at Disney. Give me my James Marsden song!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

ROFLMAO!!!! this was the guy (yes guy) who was begging everyone to leave Britney Spears alone, right? Chris Crocker...(our minds have become wastlands of useless information).


15 posted on 04/16/2008 7:11:53 AM PDT by Hildy (Obama: "Yes, I sat in his church, but I didn't inhale.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

In other words, it’s a perfect mirror of the “culture” that modern liberalism has inspired in America...


16 posted on 04/16/2008 7:12:05 AM PDT by rockrr (Global warming is to science what Islam is to religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Both guilty!

The court should liquidate the estate and donate the proceedings to FReepublic!


17 posted on 04/16/2008 7:17:20 AM PDT by papasmurf (Unless I post a link to resource, what I post is opinion, regardless of how I spin it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

Sadly, yes. A good, albeit depressing, observation.


18 posted on 04/16/2008 7:17:44 AM PDT by Obadiah (I dream of the day when chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Well, ‘Victory’ came up in her cards that morning so i’m sure everything will turn out fine for her.


19 posted on 04/16/2008 7:19:51 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

She was hot for him in the beginning...anybody can see that.


20 posted on 04/16/2008 7:22:28 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson