Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to Call for Greenhouse-Gas Curbs Pressured for Years, President Warms To Broad Regulation
WSJ ^ | April 16, 2008 | JOHN D. MCKINNON and STEPHEN POWER

Posted on 04/16/2008 6:20:04 AM PDT by Brilliant

In a significant shift on global warming, President Bush will propose stopping growth in U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions by 2025 and signal that he is open to lawmakers reining in pollution from power companies.

The stance, set to be unveiled Wednesday at a White House speech, indicates Mr. Bush's willingness to grapple with the growing legislative debate over global warming. It marks an acknowledgment by the Bush administration that the U.S. likely will adopt some sort of broad new legal system to curb greenhouse-gas emissions in coming years. Mr. Bush has opposed comprehensive legislation to curb emissions.

But like an increasing number of utilities and manufacturers, he is aiming to join the discussions in hopes of shaping the debate and creating a system that won't be too costly to industry or consumers.

Mr. Bush faces the challenge of attracting sympathetic Republicans to support concrete proposals in the waning days of his administration. The White House is under pressure from a growing number of big businesses to take more action this year to spare them from the prospect of still-tougher regulation.

All three major presidential candidates, including Republican Sen. John McCain, have supported efforts to curb emissions that are more onerous than some industries would like. The Bush administration contends that one proposal, soon to be debated in the Senate, that seeks to halt emissions growth by 2012 is too costly.

Mr. Bush's goals will likely face criticism from Democrats and environmental groups because they are less ambitious than other targets before U.S. lawmakers. They also will face hostility from conservatives who worry that showing flexibility now will mean giving up too much ground...

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: climatechange; doomage; dubyage; globalwarming; kyoto; wearedoomed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Is Bush pulling a "Bill Clinton" here? Bill Clinton imposed strict cyanide rules just as he left office in order to create political and economic hardship for the Bush administration. Now it looks like Bush may be planning to leave his own successor an even bigger political and economic hardship.
1 posted on 04/16/2008 6:20:05 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

He’s doing it to give McCain cover to be the “Climate Change Candidate”. All that matters to these guys is that a republican wins in November, and the country be damned.


2 posted on 04/16/2008 6:22:21 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant; proud_yank; FrPR; enough_idiocy; rdl6989; IrishCatholic; Delacon; ...
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

3 posted on 04/16/2008 6:29:50 AM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: DManA
He’s doing it to give McCain cover to be the “Climate Change Candidate”. All that matters to these guys is that a republican wins in November, and the country be damned.

Well since all 3 current candidates are currently talking green and every damn commercial on television brags about being green, it's clear that America is stuck in a green fantasy right now. Sometimes the best way to show people they are wrong, is to let them have a taste of what they think they want. In the long run, it might actually be better for the country to experience a little pain to clear their vision.

5 posted on 04/16/2008 6:41:38 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

bump


6 posted on 04/16/2008 6:45:34 AM PDT by lowbridge ("I can't wait to see what he stands for." - Susan Sarandon on her support of Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arbooz
What political party does Bush represent again?

The Communist Party?

7 posted on 04/16/2008 6:46:05 AM PDT by lowbridge ("I can't wait to see what he stands for." - Susan Sarandon on her support of Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
In a significant shift on global warming, President Bush will propose stopping growth

First , I understand the Planet has been cooling for the last ten years.

Secondly, Bush does not put his trust in YHvH or "Jesus"


8 posted on 04/16/2008 7:25:08 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Is Bush pulling a “Bill Clinton” here? Bill Clinton imposed strict cyanide rules just as he left office in order to create political and economic hardship for the Bush administration. Now it looks like Bush may be planning to leave his own successor an even bigger political and economic hardship.”

Could be. McCain’s election could temper this action.


9 posted on 04/16/2008 7:32:23 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

This will be a catastrophic blow to our economy. How can we compete against China, India and many other countries that are unrestrained polluters? Bush has worked against our country is so many ways that I feel dirty for having voted for him [yes, I know the alternative was far worse].


10 posted on 04/16/2008 8:06:18 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (When hopelessness replaces hope, it opens the door to evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic

Don’t worry. All of our manufacturing cos have moved overseas anyway.


11 posted on 04/16/2008 8:52:12 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: arbooz

The same one as McCain.

How long will it be until some of the sheeple realize this election is lose-lose?


12 posted on 04/16/2008 10:18:31 AM PDT by Crazieman (Vote Juan McAmnesty in 2008! Because freedom abroad is more important than freedom at home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

What on earth makes you believe that? As recently as 2 or 3 weeks ago McCain had a global warming speech that Bush basically parroted.


13 posted on 04/16/2008 10:19:38 AM PDT by Crazieman (Vote Juan McAmnesty in 2008! Because freedom abroad is more important than freedom at home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
DUBYAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

CO2 Science, Vol. 11, No. 16

Global warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

14 posted on 04/16/2008 5:58:41 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (To the liberal, there's no sacrifice too big for somebody else to make. --FReeper popdonnelly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic
This will be a catastrophic blow to our economy. How can we compete against China, India and many other countries that are unrestrained polluters?

That may not be true if supplies remain limited, particularly oil. High energy prices can hamstring an economy (look at how the current high prices are causing across-the-board inflation). If the U.S. commits to emissions reductions, the power companies will be forced to underwrite a lot of conservation technologies that will in the long-term strengthen our economy.

15 posted on 04/17/2008 7:14:18 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I actually think these actions are quite prudent, given what we know. Actually, the lefties will be screaming that these things are not nearly enough. Oh well, you can’t make everyone happy, and sometimes you can’t make ANYONE happy...


16 posted on 04/17/2008 7:20:40 AM PDT by Paradox (Politics: The art of convincing the populace that your delusions are superior to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

Handled right, this could give nuclear power plant construction a boost


17 posted on 04/17/2008 7:26:00 AM PDT by justaguy (Whatever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Somebody’s making money off of this Green Scam.


18 posted on 04/17/2008 7:27:02 AM PDT by dfwgator (11+7+15=3 Heismans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
What political party does Bush represent again? The Communist Party?

Make that the Chinese Communist Party.

19 posted on 04/17/2008 7:28:01 AM PDT by dfwgator (11+7+15=3 Heismans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Somebody’s making money off of this Green Scam.

Everybody's making money off the Green Scam. Have you seen all the "green" commercials right now?

20 posted on 04/17/2008 7:31:06 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson