Skip to comments.
German schoolboy, 13, corrects NASA's asteroid figures: paper
physorg ^
| 4/15/08
Posted on 04/15/2008 4:30:27 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
At least it wasn't a big error, only a factor of 100. And it wasn't about an important subject, only a killer asteroid. Yeah NASA!
To: Straight Vermonter
Gives me plenty of confidence in their global warming predictions. /s
To: Straight Vermonter
america's public schools --- why bother with education when there is so much eco-brainwashing and social engineering to be done.
math and science isn't as important as having american kids learn about global warming and the activist gay agenda.
3
posted on
04/15/2008 4:35:37 PM PDT
by
kingattax
(99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
To: Straight Vermonter
"the young whizzkid had got it right.: Rut row, NASA needs to get it's collective head out of it's a$$.
How scary is this?
4
posted on
04/15/2008 4:36:57 PM PDT
by
#1CTYankee
(That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
To: Straight Vermonter
Well this didn’t tell us anything we didn’t know about N.A.S.A. by now. Beyond that, yawn...
5
posted on
04/15/2008 4:44:01 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(McCain is rock solid on SCOTUS judicial appointments. He voted for Ginsberg, Kennedy and Souter.)
To: #1CTYankee
“Rut row, NASA needs to get it’s collective head out of it’s a$$.”
NASA ain’t what it used to be.
6
posted on
04/15/2008 4:44:22 PM PDT
by
Hacklehead
(Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
To: Straight Vermonter
This kid will make a great bookie!
7
posted on
04/15/2008 4:45:42 PM PDT
by
BullDog108
(A Smith & Wesson beats four aces)
To: Straight Vermonter
There is a lot of empty space up there. What is the probability of a Satellite-Comet collision?
8
posted on
04/15/2008 4:46:14 PM PDT
by
fso301
To: Straight Vermonter
Well good, now can we turn the Global Warming B/S over to the second graders for a definitive answer?
9
posted on
04/15/2008 4:47:02 PM PDT
by
Gator113
(Hey Obama, "I drink your milkshake.")
To: Straight Vermonter
Putting on my tinfoil hat, I wonder if they just didn’t want us to know how high the odds are.
10
posted on
04/15/2008 4:47:43 PM PDT
by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: Straight Vermonter
The only plan now is to catalog these things. There is no hardware in space to deal with something that emerges from space on a three-day collision course, which is what will get us. It will come up unexpected and it will probably be a swarm rather than a single asteroid.
11
posted on
04/15/2008 4:48:17 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: Straight Vermonter
Obviously it was yet another kilometer to mile conversion mistake by NASA ;)
12
posted on
04/15/2008 4:49:57 PM PDT
by
SengirV
To: Straight Vermonter
The schoolboy took into consideration the risk of Apophis running into one or more of the 40,000 satellites orbiting Earth during its path close to the planet on April 13 2029. Those satellites travel at 3.07 kilometres a second (1.9 miles), at up to 35,880 kilometres above earth -- and the Apophis asteroid will pass by earth at a distance of 32,500 kilometres.
Does this mean that NASA did not take this risk in to account.
If it does it seems like a rather large oversight. I as a relatively uneducated individual thought about the possibility when Apophis close approach was reported last year.
13
posted on
04/15/2008 4:50:55 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
(Your message here.)
To: Hacklehead
"NASA aint what it used to be." Maybe they need to go back to duct tape and bubble gum.
Seems to me NASA is regressing, a pinnacle reached back in the early 70's? How pathetic is that!
14
posted on
04/15/2008 4:53:19 PM PDT
by
#1CTYankee
(That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
To: Straight Vermonter
The schoolboy took into consideration the risk of Apophis running into one or more of the 40,000 satellites orbiting Earth during its path close to the planet on April 13 2029. Those satellites travel at 3.07 kilometres a second (1.9 miles), at up to 35,880 kilometres above earth -- and the Apophis asteroid will pass by earth at a distance of 32,500 kilometres.
If the asteroid strikes a satellite in 2029, that will change its trajectory making it hit earth on its next orbit in 2036.
This raises the possibility that a satellite could intentionally be used to alter the course of the asteroid.
15
posted on
04/15/2008 4:53:44 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: BullDog108
That would be a great, unmarried bookie.
16
posted on
04/15/2008 4:54:13 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: Straight Vermonter
"
whilst creating a thick cloud of dust..." Just how would a cloud of dust rise from the Atlantic ocean? - Is there anything NASA can get right anymore? They sure blew it when they conveniently forgot about the missing data from Siberian stations and arrived at the conclusion that we were warming when we were cooling.
17
posted on
04/15/2008 4:54:37 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: Moonman62
"
This raises the possibility that a satellite could intentionally be used to alter the course of the asteroid." Or a nuclear warhead on an ICBM.... Nah, they made them to kill people, not save'm.
18
posted on
04/15/2008 4:59:44 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: Straight Vermonter
Not surprising. Today’s NASA is a shadow of yesterday’s.
To: Straight Vermonter
First Hubble, now this sh*t, WTF? Everyone makes mistakes but these care kinda important. NASA needs a better QA program now! Come on boys....get your sh*t together....
20
posted on
04/15/2008 5:01:04 PM PDT
by
homeguard
((Charlie Don't Surf!))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson