Posted on 04/15/2008 4:00:16 PM PDT by Santa Fe_Conservative
It's not hard to figure out who plays the "husband" and "wife" in a homosexual couple, and appoint the shaftor and shaftee accordingly.
filthy disease ridden queers whine again...
“Be careful what you wish for, huh?”
LOL “Sorry folks, you can’t get there from here.”
They couldn’t have been married all that long.
Crying for a divorce already and they can’t get one?
The whole deal is just plain goofy!
One word: Assets. In Texas, we have what we call the $49 dollar divorce. It's not really $49, but rather a slang term for self-filing divorces with disputes over divisions of joint property. Usually there is no joint property. What you're describing above is a $49 divorce without the $49 worth of paperwork.
The problem arises when you have joint property that needs to be divided and both parties want:
The time share in Vail.
Raul the Pomeranian.
The Gucci bag in which Raul is carried.
Cher's greatest hits on vinyl.
Elton the anthology on CD.
Ellen a retrospective on DVD.
Melissa Etheridge live at the Hollywood Bowl on Blue-ray.
Mars pattern china (Homosexuals only).
Venus pattern china (Lesbians only).
Andy Warhol memorial phallic sconces from the metro collection.
The good vibrations cornucopia of semi-marital aids.
And most important of all...the video collection
Exactly. And if they don't get their way, they can sue.
Absolutely transparent manipulation.
In a related story, the mayor of Hetero lamented that his town never gets to be destroyed by fire and brimstone like Sodom and Gomorrah did.
In other words, the activists are trying to create defacto recognition of gay marriage in states where it’s not recognized by filing for ‘divorce’ there. Slippery move, but, hopefully, they won’t find a lot of courts that’ll fall for it.
A whole new business opens up for divorce lawyers
Can you imagine the billable hours two old queens would generate just fussing over who gets the Spode?
Brilliant post, acidly funny and spot on. Good work.
Thank you very much.
Yes, and didn’t a Rhode Island court already say it couldn’t happen?
ROTFL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.