Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some gay couples are having trouble obtaining divorces
AP via Yahoo ^ | 4/15/08 | RAY HENRY

Posted on 04/15/2008 4:00:16 PM PDT by Santa Fe_Conservative

PROVIDENCE, R.I. - Gay couples had to struggle mightily to win the right to marry or form civil unions. Now, some are finding that breaking up is hard to do, too.

In Rhode Island, for example, the state's top court ruled in December that gays married in neighboring Massachusetts can't get divorced here because lawmakers have never defined marriage as anything but a union between a man and woman. In Missouri, a judge is deciding whether a lesbian married in Massachusetts can get an annulment.

"We all know people who have gone through divorces. At the end of that long and unhappy period, they have been able to breathe a sigh of relief," said Cassandra Ormiston of Rhode Island, who is splitting from her wife, Margaret Chambers. But "I do not see that on my horizon, that sigh of relief that it's over."

Over the past four years, Massachusetts has been the only state where gay marriage is legal, while nine other states allow gay couples to enter into civil unions or domestic partnerships that offer many of the rights and privileges of marriage. The vast majority of these unions require court action to dissolve.

Gay couples who still live in the state where they got hitched can split up with little difficulty; the laws in those states include divorce or dissolution procedures for same-sex couples. But gay couples who have moved to another state are running into trouble.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: divorce; gay; gaydivorce; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; lesbians; samesexdivorce; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Committing one abnomination one right after the other...I pray for their souls and their realization of the sinful lives they lead.
1 posted on 04/15/2008 4:00:17 PM PDT by Santa Fe_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

LOL! Be careful what you wish for, huh?


2 posted on 04/15/2008 4:01:25 PM PDT by Califreak (Hangin' with Hunter-under the bus "Dread and Circuses")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

Maybe they should go back to Mass. where they got the original “marriage” performed.


3 posted on 04/15/2008 4:01:28 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Catch the Korean Wave, one Bae Yong Joon film at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

What Gaia hath joined together, let not Man put asunder.


4 posted on 04/15/2008 4:03:31 PM PDT by Argus (Obama: All turban and no goats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative
I still don't get why gay couples have to even bother getting a divorce if their marriage is not legal in the state in which they live to begin with. There's nothing stopping them from simply moving on with their lives since there was no legal marriage to begin with.

This should only be a problem in Massachusetts or any other state in which gay marriage is legal.

5 posted on 04/15/2008 4:04:28 PM PDT by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

Hmm, I wonder why my tagline didn’t show up in that post...


6 posted on 04/15/2008 4:05:14 PM PDT by Santa Fe_Conservative (The RINOs think that they have won but we shall see who has the last laugh in '08...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

Gay couples divorce? No way!


7 posted on 04/15/2008 4:06:42 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (US Constitution Article 4 Section 4..shall protect each of them against Invasion...domestic Violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

Now let’s have no talk of their being hoist on their own petards and that sort of thing...


8 posted on 04/15/2008 4:07:25 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

It’s just another “back door” to the agenda. They know some states will NEVER recognize gay marriage; so instead of attacking it head on, attack it from another angle, gay divorce. If they can get the divorce recognized, then the state MUST recognize that a legal marriage took existed in the first place. Veeerrryy sneeky.


9 posted on 04/15/2008 4:08:45 PM PDT by Clock King (Bring the noise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative
Hmm, I wonder why my tagline didn’t show up in that post...

It never does when you first post a thread. Check out some other threads. You'll see that it is the same with all of us.

10 posted on 04/15/2008 4:09:57 PM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
You make an excellent point.Although I'm not a lawyer it seems to me that these attempts to get "divorced" might be a stealth plan to get some state or (Federal) judge outside of Mass to grant a "divorce",thus starting a process which,in the end,legalizes homosexual "marriage" by judicial fiat in that state.

Which is,essentially,what happened in Mass.

11 posted on 04/15/2008 4:11:13 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Women swooned in Mao's presence too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clock King
If they can get the divorce recognized, then the state MUST recognize that a legal marriage took existed in the first place.

Point. I guess in this situation the "sentence" is far worse... move to Massachusetts and live with someone you can't be with for a year just to get a divorce!

12 posted on 04/15/2008 4:11:32 PM PDT by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: P8riot

Your right! I just never noticed until now lol...


13 posted on 04/15/2008 4:13:28 PM PDT by Santa Fe_Conservative (The RINOs think that they have won but we shall see who has the last laugh in '08...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative
Hmm, I wonder why my tagline didn’t show up in that post...


14 posted on 04/15/2008 4:13:35 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

Its all just another insincere drama queen ploy to drag Rhode Island into the toilet with Massachusetts.

Gay Agenda carefully crafted manipulation number 21776.


15 posted on 04/15/2008 4:13:55 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative
Gay couples who still live in the state where they got hitched can split up with little difficulty; ....

What about the "he gets to keep half of all your stuff plus alimony" part?

16 posted on 04/15/2008 4:21:29 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

Aren’t these the same people who are always griping at Bush for getting into something without an exit strategy?


17 posted on 04/15/2008 4:21:50 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (This is an Obama-nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Califreak
Some gay couples are having trouble obtaining divorces

I can see the basic legal problem with a lesbian "mariage"? If there is no man in the relationship to shaft, how is a divorce possible?

18 posted on 04/15/2008 4:25:22 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (This is an Obama-nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

the totally retarded part about this is that there is no such thing as ‘divorce’ since these couples aren’t ‘married’ in these states. If they want to split up, then just F’ing split up!!! What else do you want from the government??? Need to divide your assets? Go ahead. Nobody is stopping them. They can sell real estate or argue over who gets the pet cats but none of this requires the government to consent. Mediators can be hired for this purpose despite there being no civil case filed.

And in most cases divorces get hung up on custody of children. And since that isn’t an issue, just decide who is getting what and shut the F up!!!! If you can’t decide who gets what, hire a arbitrator and agree to Binding Arbitration (just like people do in civil courts everywhere).

All this whining and moaning about not ‘being able to get divorced’ because they are lesbians is nonsense. Virtually all aspects of any divorce are simply divisions of property which don’t legally require even a court approval or involvement. The divorce lawyers would probably love to take on queer clients with or without a ‘divorce’ being legal in the state. Lawyers will bill you whether or not the state legalized gay marriage so feel free to get shafted by them just like straight couples who divorce.

Welcome to the downside of marriage, Queers!!!


19 posted on 04/15/2008 4:37:19 PM PDT by bpjam (Drill For Oil or Lose Your Job!! Vote Nov 3, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

“What liberalism has joined together let no man (or woman) put asunder”


20 posted on 04/15/2008 4:38:45 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson