This should only be a problem in Massachusetts or any other state in which gay marriage is legal.
It’s just another “back door” to the agenda. They know some states will NEVER recognize gay marriage; so instead of attacking it head on, attack it from another angle, gay divorce. If they can get the divorce recognized, then the state MUST recognize that a legal marriage took existed in the first place. Veeerrryy sneeky.
Which is,essentially,what happened in Mass.
One word: Assets. In Texas, we have what we call the $49 dollar divorce. It's not really $49, but rather a slang term for self-filing divorces with disputes over divisions of joint property. Usually there is no joint property. What you're describing above is a $49 divorce without the $49 worth of paperwork.
The problem arises when you have joint property that needs to be divided and both parties want:
The time share in Vail.
Raul the Pomeranian.
The Gucci bag in which Raul is carried.
Cher's greatest hits on vinyl.
Elton the anthology on CD.
Ellen a retrospective on DVD.
Melissa Etheridge live at the Hollywood Bowl on Blue-ray.
Mars pattern china (Homosexuals only).
Venus pattern china (Lesbians only).
Andy Warhol memorial phallic sconces from the metro collection.
The good vibrations cornucopia of semi-marital aids.
And most important of all...the video collection