Burden of proof -- Clinton counts on delegate math

tribune-review ^ | salena zito

[Salena Zito]

Burden of proof -- Clinton counts on delegate math

By Salena Zito TRIBUNE-REVIEW Sunday, April 13, 2008

Every other story written by journalists across the country gives a spreadsheet of reasons why Hillary Clinton should step out of the Democrats' campaign. Yet in the public's eye, there she stands as though she has not a care in the world.

One reason may be that the party's super-delegates who remain uncommitted have an unspoken burden of proof to determine whether this race goes on or not. So far, they have not exercised their superpowers.

[The Ghost of Rudy McRomney]

There you go, buying into the old Clinton rope-a-dope again. They were never in any danger of losing PA, and will do so in double digits, making her once more the ‘comeback kid’. This is all a mere setup. These polls are phony and rigged, IMO.

[RightWhale]

Just got back from church and was cleaning my guns and grousing about how bad it is anymore in Smalltown of the North, and the picture of Hillary!08 knocking back a shot was heartwarming. We would have no hope were it not for the $30 billion Denali pipeline and Hillary!08.

[The Ghost of Rudy McRomney]

This is a safe bet.
Never
Gonna
Happen
They will steal the nomination -and perhaps the presidency.

[bannie]

These people make me angry. They feign surprise at the behavior of the bastard whom they enabled...AFTER they scorned and pooh-poohed those of us who cried out, “The emperor is naked!”

They have NO HONOR, and they don't care that we all know it.

We're in a freaky world in which many pretend that up is down; therefore, something’s gonna’ blow.

[bannie]

Isn't “warning” of a “riot” a blatant threat to what will happen if Barrack Hussein Obama doesn't get elected?

[bannie]

Clintons cheat. If they get into the final race, they will cheat at the ballot box.

[maine-iac7]

would seem as tho’