Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the invisib1e hand
how was much of 19th century imperialism and empire building not jingoistic in nature? It was very much a time of nationalistic triumphalism (and finally came to a head in the Great War).
14 posted on 04/11/2008 6:01:04 PM PDT by Republican Party Reptile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Republican Party Reptile
Good point -- by the end of the 1700s, you had firmly developed STATEs, not just kingdoms -- the cohesive states were the ones that developed first: England had been united since King John lost Western France, Spain had been united since Francis and Isabella in 1491, Portugal since the 12th century and these were the first major colonial powers and, I must'nt forget the Russians who since the defeat of Kazan had been expanding their empire east. Then the netherlands came and so did the Belgians. The Italians and Germans were johnny come latelies who were eager to grab a piece of the pie but found that most of the good bits were taken, so they fought.

The same thing is happening now with China -- China is really envious of the way the US had tied up most of the world economically (I say "had" because we're losing our grip on Africa and S. America)
49 posted on 04/12/2008 12:27:21 AM PDT by Cronos ("Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant" - Omar Ahmed, CAIR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson