Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harnessing Biology, and Avoiding Oil, for Chemical Goods
NY Times ^ | April 9, 2008 | YUDHIJIT BHATTACHARJEE

Posted on 04/11/2008 12:16:53 AM PDT by neverdem

THE next time you stop at a gas station, wincing at the $3.50-a-gallon price and bemoaning society’s dependence on petroleum, take a step back and look inside your car.

Much of what you see in there comes from petroleum, too: the plastic dashboard, the foam in the seats. More than a tenth of the world’s oil is spent not on powering engines but as a feedstock for making chemicals that enrich many goods — from cosmetics to cleaners and fabric to automobile parts.

In recent years, this unsettling fact has motivated academic researchers and corporations to find ways to make bulk chemicals from renewable sources like corn and switchgrass. The effort to tap biomass for chemicals runs parallel to the higher-stakes research aimed at developing biofuels. Researchers hope that the two will come together soon to help replace petroleum refineries with biorefineries.

“As petroleum prices go up and climate change becomes a serious concern, the economy will have no choice but to switch to a chemical base derived from plant materials,” said Dr. Richard Gross, director of the Center for Biocatalysis and Bioprocessing of Macromolecules at Polytechnic University in Brooklyn.

The chemical industry is beginning to make that transition, at least for a few products. One success story is a method developed by DuPont, with Genencor, to ferment corn sugar into a substance called propanediol. Using propanediol as a starting point, DuPont has created a new polymer it calls Cerenol, which it substitutes for petroleum-sourced ingredients in products like auto paints.

Similarly, the biotech giant Cargill has begun manufacturing a polymer from vegetable oils that is used in polyurethane foams, which is found in beddings, furniture and car-seat headrests. Cargill says that using the polymer does more than save crude oil and reduce carbon emissions: the foam it produces has...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: biology; cellulosicethanol; chemicalfeedstocks; energy; organicchemistry; science
Chemistry Aimed at Conservation
1 posted on 04/11/2008 12:16:54 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This will just add more demand for non-food uses of food crops. I’m sure consumers will just love the higher food prices that will result.


2 posted on 04/11/2008 12:37:10 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
Clearing the Air Over Asbestos

Right whales wronged - The US proposes offshore drilling in endangered whales' summer haunt.

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

3 posted on 04/11/2008 12:41:43 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
This will just add more demand for non-food uses of food crops. I’m sure consumers will just love the higher food prices that will result.

"The company is also commercializing a way to make nylon entirely from renewable feedstocks like starch and cellulose."

Trash today, ethanol tomorrow

They identified bacteria and are getting a handle on the enzymes on this link. Click on the keyword cellulosicethanol for more threads. Subsidized, corn grain derived ethanol from fermentation and distillation is nuts.

4 posted on 04/11/2008 1:05:23 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Subsidized, corn grain derived ethanol from fermentation and distillation is nuts.

Sometimes I think it isn't about conservation or alternative energy so much as the cut-your-nose-off-to-spite-your-face 'war' against "Eeevil BIG Oil".

If this can be done with a net energy gain which makes it economical and does not disrupt food supplies, great. Otherwise, back to the drawing board.

5 posted on 04/11/2008 1:19:12 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...

This would be great, provided we go back to oxen- and horse-drawn ploughs. :’) Thanks neverdem.


6 posted on 04/11/2008 6:12:15 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
This will just add more demand for non-food uses of food crops. I’m sure consumers will just love the higher food prices that will result

Actually non-food crops such as switchgrass are holding a lot of promise.

Don't throw out the baby with the bath water.

7 posted on 04/11/2008 6:20:10 AM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
Sometimes I think it isn't about conservation or alternative energy so much as the cut-your-nose-off-to-spite-your-face 'war' against "Eeevil BIG Oil".

It's also about pandering for farm-state votes and payback for all those campaign contributions from the likes of Archer-Daniels Midland.

8 posted on 04/11/2008 8:13:17 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson