What Went Wrong with the Clinton Campaign ("What we are talking about here is plain old arrogance")

Real Clear Politics ^ | 04/10/2008 | Jay Cost

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Ping! ;)

[nyyankeefan]

What Went Wrong with the Clinton Campaign....

in one word.....hillary....

she is just plain unlikeable and no matter what lies she tells...the public won’t buy them the way they bought the lies of bj and now are buying the lies and pandering of b. HUSSEIN!!!!!

[Joe Boucher]

You know Mr. & Mrs. Clinton just can’t believe this nobody magic negro is beating Hillary.
How can the ingrates choose him when she is running?
How can the people be so stupid?
Don’t the people understand that Mrs. Clinton is the chosen one?
Don’t the people understand that Mrs. Clinton knows what is best for them?

[mware]

Geeze, I just watched a clip of Bill and Hill walk on stage for the Elton John concert. They looked like they were wearing matching suits. Wait until Freepers get their hands on that photo.

[Son House]

Clinton is the Democrats only hope of stopping a President McDole, Obama is too soured by those in his social circles, Rev, Wife, Rezko, ect.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Geeze, I just watched a clip of Bill and Hill walk on stage for the Elton John concert. They looked like they were wearing matching suits.

Dogs and their owners invariably grow to look like one another, after a few years. ;)

[bkepley]

Well I live in moonbat central and maybe it’s different elsewhere but here Clinton lost before the contest started when she tried to move to the center.

[gridlock]

Problem #1: Hillary Rodham Clinton
Problem #2: Bill Clinton

Given those two problems, it is hard to make a candidacy work.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Well I live in moonbat central

Oh? Welcome to Seattle. ;)

[TomGuy]

The total populations of the states Clinton has won are significantly greater than the populations of the states Obama has.

Clinton is right when she claims her wins are bigger than Obama’s.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

True, but (in the final analysis) largely irrelevant, really. States won by Cankles such as, for instance, California and New York will unquestionably end up going for the Democratic nominee, no matter which one of them (Hillary or Obama) it ends up being. Her argument — essentially, “only I can win the biggest electoral prizesn out there” — doesn’t really hold much water. (Throw in Illinois, which is Obama’s for the asking, and you have three of the top five electoral plums, right there.) ;)

[Miss Didi]

I just saw that clip this morning...my first thought was—ugh, will this family ever go away!

[Miss Didi]

[TomGuy]

will this family ever go away!

It creates a quandary: Give Hillary Clinton the Oval Office, or at least the nomination, or give it to Barak Hussein Obama.

Wanna bet that, if Obama does win the presidency, we will see Michelle O running for the Senate after her stint as First Lady? Heck. She might even fore-go the FL position and seek appointment to the Senate seat hubby would be vacating.

So, which is worse?

[Quix]

It is UNBELIEVABLY MIND BOGGLING

That ANY

sentient creature

could imagine

that her unroyal lowness, her hideous heinous

would run the country better than she has

destructively mangled her own campaign.

Have the puppet masters already reduced 98% of the nation into mindless vacuum headed sheeple?

Is it in the toothpaste? Transmitting from cell-phone towers . . .

How DO

they DO

THAT!?

[Quix]

The fierce demonic evil and meanness of Shrillery is worse.

Maybe not by several horse lengths but at least by a horse’s rear’s worth.

She’d rush us into the global government at the speed of light.

Obumma would be somewhat slower.

[VastRWCon]

If you weren't my daughter...

[cubreporter]

hillereeee is worse. Always has been from the time old impeached willie became prez. I woudln’t vote for her no way no how. Obama...he’ll win the nomination and I personally will be so glad to see hilllleree the arrogant one go down to defeat.