Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S.F. ban on handguns dealt a final defeat
Sfgate.com ^

Posted on 04/09/2008 6:48:56 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

S.F. ban on handguns dealt a final defeat

Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

(04-09) 17:19 PDT SAN FRANCISCO -- The state Supreme Court dealt a final blow Wednesday to San Francisco's voter-approved ban on handguns, rejecting the city's appeal of a lower-court ruling that sharply limited the ability of localities to regulate firearms.

The court's unanimous order was a victory for the National Rifle Association, which sued on behalf of gun owners, advocates and dealers a day after the measure passed with 58 percent of the vote in November 2005. The initiative has never taken effect.

The ordinance, Proposition H, would have forbidden San Francisco residents to possess handguns, exempting only law enforcement officers and others who needed guns for professional purposes. It would have also prohibited the manufacture, sale or distribution of any type of firearms or ammunition in San Francisco.

Lower courts ruled that the measure interfered with a statewide system of gun regulation, which bars certain types of weapons and allows others. The rulings did not address the scope of the constitutional right to bear arms under the Second Amendment, the focus of a pending U.S. Supreme Court case involving a handgun ban in Washington, D.C.

The state courts recognized that "law-abiding citizens are part of the solution, not part of the problem of violent crime," said Chuck Michel, lawyer for the plaintiffs in the NRA suit. "The authority of local cities to over-regulate firearms is very limited."

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ban; banglist; ruling; sf
Best news all day......
1 posted on 04/09/2008 6:48:57 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; Joe Brower

Good deal BTTT !


2 posted on 04/09/2008 6:51:42 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It can be almost disorienting when sanity prevails these days.


3 posted on 04/09/2008 6:52:43 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’ll drink to that!!!!


4 posted on 04/09/2008 6:54:28 PM PDT by Rob112586 ("...a decrease in the quantity of legislation generally means an increase in the quality of life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
- The state Supreme Court dealt a final blow Wednesday to San Francisco's voter-approved ban on handguns, rejecting the city's appeal of a lower-court ruling that sharply limited the ability of localities to regulate firearms. The court's unanimous order was a victory for the National Rifle Association

Great news!

5 posted on 04/09/2008 6:54:32 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
It would have also prohibited the manufacture, sale or distribution of any type of firearms or ammunition in San Francisco.

I wonder if this was intended to also prohibit reloading.

"You can have my reloading press when you pry it from my cold, dead, fingers!"

6 posted on 04/09/2008 6:55:57 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The way the legislature of that state is, they will probaby just either ban ‘em statewide, or more likely, give SF an exemption to the premeption law.

Never mind me, it’s been one of those days. :(


7 posted on 04/09/2008 6:56:06 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Thanks to the NRA.

And no thanks to the sorry freepers who constantly whine like little children when the NRA “doesn’t do enough”.


8 posted on 04/09/2008 6:57:27 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Vote against the dem party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

9 posted on 04/09/2008 6:58:04 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Outstanding. There is a tendency in certain communities (Berkeley, Santa Cruz...) whose leadership is captured by those of a certain political bent to regard them as separate from, and superior to, the Constitutional strictures constraining the rest of us. They’ll blame the NRA, naturally.


10 posted on 04/09/2008 7:03:45 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

On behalf of the armed populace of San Francisco, THANK YOU NRA!!!


11 posted on 04/09/2008 7:04:14 PM PDT by InABunkerUnderSF ("Gun Control" is not about the guns. "Illegal Immigration" is not about the immigration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Herrera's office urged the justices to declare that "local governments retain significant, meaningful ... power to protect their residents against gun violence."

The best way to protect the residents of San Francisco against gun violence would be to announce that the County of San Francisco (SF is both a City and a County) would issue concealed carry permits to anyone who could demonstrate that he had paid Federal Income Tax last year. This would leave out most of the hoodlums, but give permits to responsible citizens.

Just watch the crime rate go down.

12 posted on 04/09/2008 7:04:14 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave

add a drug test and proof of citizenship too!


13 posted on 04/09/2008 7:08:12 PM PDT by Sub-Driver (Proud member of the Republican wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Hope this creates some momentum in opposing some of the recent anti gun and anti ammunition actions in the sate legislature. Unfortunately arnold has already signed one of them
14 posted on 04/09/2008 7:24:44 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Best news all day......

Nope. The best news would be that CDFG has sorted out the proposed ban on lead, handgun ammunition (both sale and possession) in San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties.

15 posted on 04/09/2008 7:59:35 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Wow, this in California?


16 posted on 04/09/2008 8:12:41 PM PDT by wastedyears (The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
In most states, local governments cannot regulate guns. Especially those that allow CCW.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

17 posted on 04/10/2008 10:41:52 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson