Skip to comments.
Ancient Imbalances Sent Earth's Continents "Wandering"
National Geographic News ^
| Continents "Wandering"
Posted on 04/09/2008 3:28:18 PM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
04/09/2008 3:28:19 PM PDT
by
blam
To: SunkenCiv
2
posted on
04/09/2008 3:29:34 PM PDT
by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: blam
3
posted on
04/09/2008 3:30:05 PM PDT
by
lesser_satan
(Vote McCain - The Choice who Sucks Less!)
To: blam
The theory states that at times Earth's surface mass becomes imbalanced. The continents become dramatically offset from the planet's spin axis and so move rapidly to right themselves Excuse me while I call out for some skepticism. Crust 50miles thick. Mantle 2000+ miles thick. A defect on the skin of an onion is not going to destabilize the entire thing when it spins.
4
posted on
04/09/2008 3:30:49 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Party ahead of principles; eventually you'll be selling out anything to anyone for the right price.)
To: blam
Whatever it is, it’s Bush’s fault.
5
posted on
04/09/2008 3:31:42 PM PDT
by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: blam
Caption to go with the fig. in post 2...
"An illustration shows what Earth's continents looked like 110 million to 100 million years ago and their rotation based on magnetic signatures in ancient rocks.
A new study suggests that the motion represents a phenomenon called true polar wander, in which Earth's landmasses become imbalanced compared to its spin axis and then move rapidly to right themselves."
6
posted on
04/09/2008 3:42:29 PM PDT
by
spunkets
("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
To: blam
A change like that today would put Richmond, Virginia, where Mexico City is now.No, thanks.
Perhaps the Absolut Vodka people were just some frustrated geophysicist wannabe types.
To: blam
A new study lends weight to the controversial theory that Earth became massively imbalanced in the distant past, sending its tectonic plates on a mad dash to even things out.
Was this after the mass was ejected that formed the moon?
8
posted on
04/09/2008 3:48:30 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: Centurion2000
"Crust 50miles thick."The crust isn't 50 mi thick. It varies. Here's a contour map of hte thickness. 1km=0.62mi.

"This contour map of the thickness of the Earth's crust was developed from the CRUST 5.1 model. The contour interval is 10 km; we also include the 45 km contour for greater detail on the continents."
9
posted on
04/09/2008 3:54:14 PM PDT
by
spunkets
("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
To: blam
All due to “Global Warming, Climate Change and anticipation of the Bush Presidency.”
10
posted on
04/09/2008 3:56:58 PM PDT
by
Don Corleone
(Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
To: aruanan
"Was this after the mass was ejected that formed the moon?"Yes.
Mother Earth only started to spin later. It was an attempt to throw all the libs off into space. That didn't work. Next she tried shifting the land masses to dump them in the ocean as they slept. As we all know, they're still here.
11
posted on
04/09/2008 3:58:24 PM PDT
by
spunkets
("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
To: blam
in other related news rosie o’donnells enormous girth contributed to hollywoods to lurch to the far left
12
posted on
04/09/2008 4:00:21 PM PDT
by
daku
("My dream continues with ferocity, thank you.")
To: blam
"We use an updated global plate-tectonic reconstruction and integrate suitable paleomagnetic results from all continents," he said.My chiropractor talks like that.
13
posted on
04/09/2008 4:09:54 PM PDT
by
billorites
(Freepo ergo sum)
To: blam
I read a good book many years ago about how the weight of the polar ice caps (not the tectonic plates themselves) caused the earth to change its polar orientation about every 7500 years. The poles would swing to the equator and cause quite a mess. It was called The HAB Theory and still has quite a following to this day. Just thought I'd share.
14
posted on
04/09/2008 4:25:10 PM PDT
by
USMA '71
To: USMA '71
I guess I don't get it. It an object, say your clothes dryer is off balance, how does the heavier side migrate to the lighter side to correct itself? I can not think of another form of matter that actually self-repels from the force acting upon it. If we could repeat such an occurrence couldn't we duplicate it as a form of perpetual motion?
15
posted on
04/09/2008 4:32:52 PM PDT
by
enraged
(What about global prosession, the 26,000 year wobble?)
To: USMA '71
Einstein was interested in that hypothesis.
16
posted on
04/09/2008 4:35:02 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: blam
To: blam
St Algore, defender of mother earth, save us from the moving plates. (sarcasm)
18
posted on
04/09/2008 4:40:50 PM PDT
by
The Great RJ
("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
To: blam
It's called lot's of water, covering the whole earth...and then the water receding.
Check the Terra computer models at Los Alamos Labs!
19
posted on
04/09/2008 4:43:20 PM PDT
by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: Centurion2000
I can imagine a “jumpstart” being given to existing plate motion, say by the Chicxulub impact, a six mile diameter rock, producing a 100 teraton blast, leaving a crater over a hundred miles across.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson