[ltc8k6]

“The U.S. military has accused Bilal Hussein, an Iraqi, of working with insurgents in Iraq. He was seized in April 2006 in Ramadi, capital of western Anbar province, and has been imprisoned without charge ever since.”

Sounds like he was charged with helping out insurgents.

Why did they write that he was accused of something and then write that he was being held without charge?

[GulfBreeze]

And if there were no charges, why would the court order that legal proceedings AGAINST him be stopped?

[weegee]

a four-judge panel in Baghdad ruled that Hussein's case falls under a new amnesty law and ordered Iraqi courts to "cease legal proceedings."

They are claiming that the charges "no longer apply".

Sounds like they know he was guilty as charged.