Posted on 04/09/2008 4:54:10 AM PDT by abb
The economic slowdown and migration of the audience to the Internet are taking their toll on staffing at the local level.
When veteran Los Angeles news anchors Harold Greene and Ann Martin were felled by a round of jobs cuts last week, they were in good company.
At least 160 employees at CBS Corp.-owned television stations in 13 cities were let go, including such seasoned broadcasters as prominent Chicago anchor Diann Burns, renowned Boston sportscaster Bob Lobel and longtime Minneapolis meteorologist Paul Douglas.
The jettisoning of such experienced on-air talent exposed the weakening of the once-robust local station business, which historically has enjoyed some of the fattest profit margins in the media industry. It marked a dramatic shift from the days when television stations paid top dollar to attract big-name anchors such as Greene and Martin, who have been TV mainstays in Los Angeles for three decades.
Today, stations are feeling the same financial squeeze as their newspaper and network news brethren. An economic slowdown, combined with changes in news consumption patterns and the migration of advertisers to the Internet, have contributed to a lean start to a year that was supposed to benefit from a gush of political advertising.
"What is happening is that 2008, on the local level, is not as strong as people had expected," said Michael Nathanson, media analyst for Bernstein Research.
CBS insists that the quality of its news won't suffer because of the cuts, which hit three-quarters of the company's 27 stations.
"We still have plenty of seasoned reporters and anchors," said Tom Kane, chief executive of the CBS Television Stations group. "We have a lot of very strong talent."
Even so, critics contend that news coverage could be further diminished because of the latest layoffs.
snip
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
Network evening newscasts will go dark after the '08 elections and their news divisions disbanded.
ping
http://blogs.mediapost.com/on_media/?p=143
CBS Searches For The Upside To The Downside
Posted April 9th, 2008 by Diane Mermigas
CBS’ financial problems reach beyond what to do about its money-losing news division. Recessionary strains on its core ad revenues will push the pure-play media company to further reduce costs and risks, dramatically alter its business models, and expand into cable and films.
Such action is imperative for CBS, which has the highest industry exposure to ad revenues (72%) and little or no offsetting income from cable, online and other complementary businesses. Depending on the length of the recession and its creative luck in prime time, CBS’ days are numbered in the old broadcast model. That means major restructuring from within–not just conventional head-count reduction. That also means reinventing–or sharing more of the risks and costs of operations, such as news-gathering.
While CBS issued a statement Tuesday that it has no new plans to further outsource its news operations with CNN, it doesn’t preclude CBS, CNN and even ABC from rekindling talks to collaborate, given broadcast networks’ irreversible declines in news ratings and ad revenues and no way to monetize costly news-gathering.
NBCU excels in such amortization across its hybrid broadcast-cable-online news operations–valued at about $11 billion, and generating an estimated $640 million in operating income this year on $1.6 billion in revenues, or about 15% of the parent company’s total. Its varied revenue streams include cable and online affiliate fees, advertising, syndication and shared subscription revenues. And this year, it’s got a combined Olympics-elections haul.
In stark contrast to the declining fortunes of broadcast and print news, cable news is soaring. CNN’s first-quarter prime-time ratings (live, AA 18-49) increased 86% from a year earlier, and its contribution to parent Time Warner grew nearly 9%, while MSNBC ratings increased 55.6% from the prior year and its contribution to parent NBC Universal grew 5%.
Television stations, like networks, are losing their content and advertising potency to the Internet. They are reinventing themselves as interactive local conduits that are more effective online and across new digital channels. In that case, local news and information becomes more critical than the national and global news that digital consumers can get anywhere. Even the political ad spend is mostly local. Morgan Stanley estimates that 90% of the $250 million in gross political ad revenues will go to the TV station group. Without it, TV stations’ revenues will decline at least 4%, and earnings will decline at least 5% in 2009.
CBS’ overall cost base must come down as its revenues are sure to fall–especially if CBS hopes to meet its forecast of 3% to 5% earnings growth in 2008. The fourth quarter of 2007 was a portent: CBS’ television operations reported a 7% decline in operating income, a 22% decline in radio and a 26% decline in publishing–only offset by a whopping 29% increase in its outdoor billboard business. Television, which represents two-thirds of CBS total revenues, and outdoor–the second-largest revenue business–also dominate CBS’ rising capital expenditures as a result of extensive digital upgrades.
This is why CBS executives are entering the unpredictable business of making movies. CBS Films plans to produce four to six movies annually, for $10 million to $50 million each, primarily to feed its Showtime premium TV channel. CBS also may tap its still-healthy balance sheet and free cash flow to aggressively bid for the Weather Channel, which will sell for between $4 billion and $5 billion. TWC provides a necessary and logical foray into the world of dual cable revenues, and is complementary to its TV stations.
It looks like CBS is creeping back toward the Mothership and the film and cable assets that went with Viacom after the combined company split in 2006–but as the current Viacom and Disney exemplify so well, they are brand extensions, and complementary businesses needed to balance the financial scales. Viacom will enjoy a gain of more than 11% in its earnings per share this year from growth in its MTV, Nickelodeon and other branded cable networks. As the lowest-rated broadcast network show reaches parity with the highest-rated cable networks’ programs, and advertising prices and revenues begin to even out, a pure-play CBS is in trouble.
A recent 10% headcount reduction at its TV station group came on the heels of cost and investment cuts at CBS Interactive, including CBS News.com and CBS.com, College Sports Television and CBS national news–much of it related to restructuring and reorganizing. On the upside, CBS recently launched a hyperlocal ad network, is more closely tying CBS Radio and its new last.fm social music site, and hit new highs with its March Madness video streaming. Little wonder that CBS is pushing for collaborative audience reach across its platforms as a new way of selling to advertisers. It can’t move fast enough.
CBS is trading at about 6.5 times its 2008 earnings estimates at a discount to its entertainment peers, as well as to pure-play TV, radio and outdoor players. Its 11 times PE is 30% below what it was for the combined Viacom, according to JP Morgan.
Before the year’s end, industry analysts may question how long or whether CBS should remain independent–even in this era of deconsolidation among media giants. The combination of declining old business lines exacerbated by hard economic times, not being able to ramp up revenues from new digital business lines fast enough, and having no cable television back stop could collectively prove to be CBS’ undoing. Against these forceful headwinds, with diminishing firepower, CBS needs to move boldly as if its life depended on it. Because it does.
FoxNews is getting the tv news crowd, because “leftist lies and opinions” no longer sells, since they have found out they aren’t getting the real news. Fox ratings have doubled this year.. and the internet too.
The dinosaur media also charges big bucks for adverttising. I’m reading articles from businesses and ad agencies questioning whether these are dollars well spent. They are looking for alternatives to spend advertising dollars.
Plus these high rates exclude millions of small businesses that can’t afford to pay $1.000-$3,000 for a monthly quarter page ad in the local newspaper. Even small two-inch ads in the local rag are going for $560 for a six week run. You can’t say much in a two-inch ad to promote your business.
And then look at the audience the MSM caters to. You’re not going to sell Corvettes, steak dinners and cigars to liberal females and purse-carrying metrosexuals.
The local sports store doesn’t run ads in the local rag. Rather, it prints its own circular and pays the newspaper to insert it in the Sunday edition.
The internet is much more efficient in delivering "target" eyeballs to advertisers. Think "narrowcast" to a select audience instead of "broadcast" to a broad audience. Using broadcast for advertising wastes lots of advertising dollars.
no way to monetize costly news-gathering.HA HA HA HA HA HA. ROTFL. ROTFLMAO. Dinomedia deathwatchers figured that one out years ago. A perpetual state of schadenfreude moves me to wax poetic by paraphrasing T S Eliot:
Translation: The money-eating bottomless pits that are the news divisions have been living off the fat of the entertainment divisions from the start. Now that the money is drying up, the truth is revealed.
The dilemma of the suits is how to kill politically powerful news divisions without all the baying and howling that's likely to result.
and Perky Katie gets how much to be in the bottom of the ratings?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/08/rather-id-probably-just-s_n_95687.html
Rather: “I’d Probably Just Sit Here And Drink” If I Had To Read CNN’s News
CBS lays off workers, while Fox News has just launched a whole new station...Fox Business Channel.
Maybe fair and balanced will eventually win out. :)
Renowned?
Really?
Guess the meaning of the word has changed quite a bit.
On another note, Lobel is from WBZ Channel 4 in Boston.
WBZ was/is "renowned" for having Liz Walker as an anchorette on the evening news. Liz was/is the epitome of a two-fer: black and female.
One evening she was doing a story about an arts festival and music was playing in the background. At the end of the piece, Liz smuggly looks at the camera and tosses out this nugget to the great unwashed viewing audience, "The music, of course, was by "Choppin.'"
a.k.a. as the lumberjack of classical music.
Cut to a commercial.
Whilst the lovely Mrs. Theknow and I were laughing like hyenas on nitrous oxide, a stunned Liz came back after the commercial break and "corrected" herself.
I seldom watch any daytime tv except maybe some atheletic event.
My wife used the tv as background noise as she does various tasks.
Last year she notice that many of the local stations on the weekend have had the paid advertising shilling for an hour or so instead of any real programing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.