Posted on 04/08/2008 4:31:56 PM PDT by wagglebee
London, England (LifeNews.com) -- While pro-life advocates have repeated the mantra for years that embryonic stem cell research hasn't helped a single patient while adult stem cells have already been used in humans afflicted with dozens of diseases, a leading scientist in England is beginning to admit defeat.
Lord Patel of Dunkeld, the chairman of the UK National Stem Cell Network and a chancellor at Dundee University, says embryonic stem cell research is simply not working.
He conceded in an interview with the Scotsman newspaper that the controversial science may never deliver new treatments for diseases.
"In terms of embryonic stem cell therapy, there is currently no such therapy that is available in a large number of patients," he said.
Patel also admitted scientists may never be able to overcome the hurdles -- such as the development or tumors or immune syndrome rejection issues -- that plague embryonic stem cell research and make it risk in humans.
"We have to be cautious," he told the Scotsman. "It may not deliver therapy for anything. We may find that stem therapy is quite a risky business."
"We had a lot of hype about gene therapy, and while we still use it in some cases it did not deliver the great promise we thought it would because of the side-effects," he said.
Despite downplaying the prospects for success, Lord Patel told the newspaper he still thought embryonic stem cell research should move forward.
The newspaper also interviewed Dr. Willy Lensch, from the Children's Hospital in Boston, who also confirmed the possibility that the prospect of embryonic stem cell research may never play out.
"I could not guarantee to anyone that this work will actually lead to improvements in disease as a definite," he admitted.
For American bioethics watchdog Wesley Smith, the admissions aren't surprising.
"For the last ten years, 'the scientists,' in order to win the political debates over embryonic stem cell research and [human cloning] often wildly hyped the potential for cures," he said.
"In the process, they convinced Californians--now facing a $16 billion budget deficit and tens of billions in bond debt--to borrow $300 million every year to pay for human cloning and embryonic stem cell research," he explained.
"States vied with each other in an Oklahoma land race type scramble to throw money at Big Biotech. The focus of the media became obsessed with overturning President Bush's funding policy, to the point that it committed serial journalistic malpractice with biased reporting and a news blockade on non embryonic stem cell successes," Smith added.
"Well, those cures have not even appeared as distant silhouettes on the horizon yet, and finally, a few in the media are beginning to notice," Smith concluded.
"By hyping the potential, the politicized science sector mislead people to win a political debate, and in the process reduced science to just another special interest spinning and obfuscating to get a greater share of gruel in the public trough."
They LIED!
Pro-Life Ping
It doesn’t matter if it works or not, the point is to devalue life and legitimize abortion. Providing cures is just a fringe benefit if anything.
Let’s hope this message reaches the steroid-affected governor of California who hoped that stem-cell research would eventually allow him to re-grow a couple.
Oh, I’m so sure this will be all over the MSM tonight! Not.
Thanks.
Finally someone admits the truth. I get so tired of hearing desparate people being fed such lies about ESCR. Being a type #1 diabetic I’ve kept a fairly close eye on the research. Personally I don’t think someone else should die so I can live easier but seeing people day after day spout the propaganda they’ve been fed is sickening.
Paging John Edwards, Paging John Edwards, I believe people are ready to get up out of their wheelchair and start walking now.
It is not uncommon for promising avenues in scientific research to lead to dead ends. This may be one of them. It is good that in America, in general, President Bush has helped minimize the number of babies who would have died to show this.
In addition to my moral opposition to embryonic stem cell research, I am also disgusted by the fact that the media acts as if embryos are the ONLY source of stem cells. Incredible advances have been made with adult (including umbilical cord) stem cell research, but because of a political agenda most people are unaware of this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.