Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Millionaire's Tax' Could Fund NYC Mass Transit
wcbstv ^ | Apr 8, 2008 | Marcia Kramer

Posted on 04/08/2008 4:22:06 PM PDT by paltz

ALBANY (CBS) ― Mayor Michael Bloomberg's congestion pricing plan may be dead, but Assembly Democrats do have a plan to raise money for mass transit: tax the rich.

It's what Albany calls a "millionaire's tax."

Yes, billionaires like Bloomberg will ante up, too.

Under the plan, people who earn over $1 million in New York state will pay an income tax surcharge of about 3/4 of 1 percent for five years. In all, it would raise over $5 billion for mass transit.

Supporters say that of the 75,000 affected taxpayers, about 35,000 don't live in New York.

"They could be ballplayers at Yankee Stadium, Shea Stadium, Madison Square Garden," Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver told CBS 2 HD. "They could be Wall Street people who live in Greenwich, Conn., or Princeton, N.J."

And with everyone scratching their heads Tuesday about how to fund mass transit, Gov. David Paterson named former MTA Chairman Richard Ravitch to head a commission to look for revenues.

"I am announcing there will be a blue ribbon commission," Paterson said.

Ravitch told CBS 2 HD that he's up to the challenge.

"Obviously, it's a tougher task with the defeat of congestion pricing because that would have provided 20 percent of what the apparent needs are," he said.

Although Bloomberg wouldn't support the so-called "millionaire's tax," Ravitch is open to it.

"Any revenue – any hockable, borrowable revenue – is a good thing," he said. "I take it any way the Legislature wants to give it to me."

Commuters are thrilled with the idea.

"It's a good thing – they should pay their fair share," Manhattan resident Michael Neal said.

Added Manhattan resident Janice Bastuni: "I think it would be a wonderful thing to pay. The mass transit system needs it."

And an interesting side note: 18 percent of the new revenue would come from the 426 taxpayers who make more than $35 million a year, with Bloomberg, of course, being one of them.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
idiots.
1 posted on 04/08/2008 4:22:06 PM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: paltz
"Any revenue – any hockable, borrowable revenue – is a good thing," he said.

Moron.

2 posted on 04/08/2008 4:29:23 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

This is truly one of the stupidest tax-related ideas I’ve heard in a long time.

Millionaires tend not to take the subway. Why, then, should they have to pay for it?

Oh yeah, because they can. Of couuuuuuuuurse. *sigh*


3 posted on 04/08/2008 4:30:37 PM PDT by Omedalus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

And what happens if those 426 taxpayers decide to move?

They’ll lose a heck of lot more than 18%.

Morons.


4 posted on 04/08/2008 4:38:43 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
The “millionaire tax” will go the way of the federal income tax. The federal income tax began as a tax supposedly only on millionaires and we all know who is taxed now especially with the meltdown of the AMT. Eventually that tax would drop to those who earn $750,000 then $500,000, then $250,000 etc...
5 posted on 04/08/2008 4:40:35 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB
And what happens if those 426 taxpayers decide to move?

That's exactly what they are already doing to a great extent.

6 posted on 04/08/2008 4:41:45 PM PDT by groanup (Politics, dog ticks, wood ticks and bed ticks. They're all parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: paltz
Bloomberg is worth an estimated 5.5 billion.

He should fund NYC mass transit, by himself.

7 posted on 04/08/2008 4:45:44 PM PDT by SIDENET (Hubba Hubba...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

lower than whale sh!t.


8 posted on 04/08/2008 4:48:25 PM PDT by xcamel (Forget the past and you're doomed to repeat it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

un-be-lievable.

Somewhere, the founding fathers are turning in their graves.


9 posted on 04/08/2008 4:55:57 PM PDT by Ethrane ("semper consolar")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Millionaire’s Tax could make all the high net worth people move out of NYC to Jersey or Long Island; or out of the country.


10 posted on 04/08/2008 4:56:58 PM PDT by allmendream
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
Under the plan, people who earn over $1 million in New York state will pay an income tax surcharge of about 3/4 of 1 percent for five years.

LIARS!!!!!!

Just like the liars who gave us the telephone tax to fund only the spanish- american war, because only rich people had phones...how many years did the telephone tax AFTER that war ended?

11 posted on 04/08/2008 4:58:51 PM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Omedalus

This is the sort of thinking that in the nineteen sixties led the movers-and-shakers in Germany, France, Italy and the U.K. to seek their fortures elsewhere. The result was a huge economic benefit to the USA. I guess it is now time that the stupid political leadership of this nation returns the favor.


12 posted on 04/08/2008 5:00:42 PM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

I am announcing there will be a blue ribbon commission,” Paterson said.
___________________________________________________

NOW WHO THE HE-L IS GOING TO PAY FOR THE BLUE RIBBON???


13 posted on 04/08/2008 5:03:53 PM PDT by JohnD9207 (Lead...follow...or get the HELL out of the way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnD9207

Ballloombaberg is going nuts, screwing NYC with never ending tax “ideas”.


14 posted on 04/08/2008 5:25:44 PM PDT by Leo Carpathian (fffffFRrrreeeeepppeeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: paltz

The Pennsylvania Sales Tax started as the Johnstown Flood relief tax in 1936.


15 posted on 04/08/2008 5:47:57 PM PDT by mak5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DB
And what happens if those 426 taxpayers decide to move?

That's when they will redefine millionaire to mean anyone making over $12K/year.

16 posted on 04/08/2008 5:48:13 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

I was thinking the same thing. I wouldn’t doubt this hasn’t already started happening in some areas around the country.


17 posted on 04/08/2008 5:49:37 PM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Omedalus

It goes with saying that it’s kind of a no-brainer to oppose a new tax, especially one that’s introduced draped in such blatant class-warfare rhetoric. However...

I do think it deserves to be said that when it comes to mass transit in this town, there is an X-factor that goes just a little deeper than knee-jerk reactions to taxation. Millionaires may not take the subway, but one could make a pretty strong argument that most millionaires likely have assets that are plugged into the financial services industry in one form or another. And that real estate values in this town, particularly commercial real estate values, have a little something to do with the ability of people to easily get to their jobs via mass transit.

The MTA is a sick, corrupt joke, but while I think we can live with Penn Station the sorry way it is since it’s been that way for so long, it’s pretty darned important that the Second Avenue Subway be realized. The conditions on the Lexington Avenue line are downright disgusting, if not dangerous, and if there’s one neighborhood in the city that investment banker-types tend to favor, it’s the Upper East Side.

Which is nearly 50% larger than the West Side, where there are two subway lines, to only one across town. Getting to work can be an extremely uncomfortable prospect, and rendering it more comfortable should pay dividends in spades. All those high-rises that went up after the Third Avenue El was dismantled are populated with quite a few people who dread taking the subway on a daily basis due to the ridiculous overcrowding—which would only get worse if the Long Island Rail Road starts running trains that terminate at Grand Central Station.

None of this is meant to let Bloomberg off the hook, but I do think the MTA is a far worse culprit here, having mismanaged projects up, down, backwards & forwards. The Fulton Street project is a fiasco possibly on the level of the Big Dig. On that basis alone the idea of a new tax is additionally repulsive. But I do think a few words are well spent pointing out that this city’s economy is tied to mass transit in a way that some may well take for granted. I happen to put a premium on providing the easiest way for financial services workers to get to and from their jobs as easily as possible. Does that justify this? Perhaps not, but I certainly want to hear a little more about it before I issue a blanket condemnation.


18 posted on 04/08/2008 6:15:58 PM PDT by One-Four-Five
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Millionaire’s Tax could make all the high net worth people move out of NYC to Jersey or Long Island; or out of the country.

They already have that issue covered: "Supporters say that of the 75,000 affected taxpayers, about 35,000 don't live in New York."

19 posted on 04/08/2008 6:18:05 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: paltz
Has anyone done the math on this? It works out to $12,910,798.12 per person. If you were faced with that kind of tax bill, would you sit still for it?

Politicians who have never held a private sector job have no idea how the real world works. Therefore, their opinions on financial matters is worthless.

20 posted on 04/08/2008 6:43:43 PM PDT by JoeA (JoeA / The defintion of insantity is repeating an action and expecting a different result.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson