Posted on 04/07/2008 4:34:19 AM PDT by Kaslin
Well, right now, $3.50 gas is all that is available. I guess other countries that pay twice that, would be buying something else if it were available.
I know it is low, like around 8%. However, if it were constant, why are the oil companies swimming in cash right now? If demand goes down, which it does when prices get this high, profits should go down as well, not break records. The point of my rant was that I personally could not in good conscience, make that kind of obscene profit at the expense of an entire economy.
So, let me get this straight, you are trying to tell me that the oil companies are testifying before congress because they are loosing money?
I meant it not as a slander sir. I agree with the capitalist system. My point is, unscrupulous types give it a bad name. Sort of like, our republic will only work with a moral populous.
As a matter of fact, I have reduced my driving significantly. I now work from home and our family switched cars with each other so the ones that drive farthest to work or school, get the best millage.
8% is a terrible profit margin. The companies are “swimming” in cash because the volume is so high.
The government makes far, far more on each gallon sold than the actual oil companies do. How does the government sleep at night with these embarassing riches?
For me, the height of this idiocy came last summer when one of my co-workers was complaining about the high fuel prices -- and said "the government better do something about it" . . . because it cost him a thousand bucks to fuel up his boat over Independence Day weekend.
I understand you consider making a 10% net profit as 'making a killing?'
What profit percentage would 'be fair' in you're opinion?
This testimony is nothing more than a political charade -- in which 535 of the most useless, unproductive people on the face of the earth actually have the b@lls to question the "profits" of an industry that is among the most efficient in the history of mankind.
Exxon/Mobil posted earnings of $40.6 billion on revenues of $404 billion in 2007 -- a return of about 10%. This was the largest annual profit in the history of capitalism, in a year when commodity prices were at historic highs . . . and this kind of profit generated all kinds of nonsensical calls from elected officials and political candidates here in the U.S. for massive taxes on these "obscene profits." You've got people and politicians in this country complaining about profits that represent a 10% return on investment in the best year of the industry's history. And these same people and politicians are complaining about "price gouging" in a retail industry where profit margins are razor-thin, and where the typical retail operation in many parts of this country is owned by a recent immigrant with a small staff working long hours at near-minimum wages.
You might want to do some research and see which industries in this country are actually the MOST profitable.
I don’t want the government to do anything but fund alternative energy research with grants and remove the barriers to nuclear energy. However, the oil companies need a new PR guy. Because they are doing plenty to get communists elected. When the average person reads about refineries cutting production to maintain the high price of the monopoly product, their blood starts to boil. Oil is a monopoly with inelastic demand, not a “free market” situation.
No. They are testifying because it is an election year and slime ball politicians want to demagogue an issue because they know with our economically illiterate population, they can get away with it.
You are an example that proves that the slimeball politicians are right.
I humbly stand corrected. I was under the impression that demand had been rising at or about historical averages and there was price gouging going on. It was not my intent to ruffle so many feathers with my rant. I fully understand how the costs of taxes and government regulation is passed on to the consumer and I deplore the fact that the government taxes fuel at such a ridiculous rate. I too, would find it a bad investment to only make about 10% return. So the answer is, we must find something cheaper to run our cars on, or pay the piper and like it, or do without.
Now secondly, you seem to think that you're the arbiter of what are or are not obscene profits. Please define "obscene" profits. More than you make? More than you think anyone should make?
I would say I am 99.999999 percent certain that the caller was not a Republican or conservative. They always give themselves away as soon as they the little three letter word “but” after they claim to be a Republican or a a conservative. They need to try a lot harder to convince me.
Several points:
1 - It is around 10%. That is an average profit margin. If a company turns in much less than that on a regular basis, investors will sell their stock - people invest based on expected rate of return, not ‘total profit’.
2 - Profits are up because demand it up, not down. Remember, demand is worldwide. China and India are using a lot more oit than they used to, and producers are not producing a whole lot more.
3 - 10% profit on $100/barrel is twice what 10% profit is on $50/barrel. So while total profits are up, percentage profits are not.
4 - If their percentage of profits go down, so will their investors. Why would an investor invest in an oil company making a 5% return if the average business is getting 10%? No investors, no cash to develop new supplies.
As many a fellow freeper has pointed out to me, gouging is not what is happening, as I was under the impression. In my opinion, yes, I am allowed to have one, A profit is obscene if it destroys the once vibrant economy of an entire nation.
....I'm really a liberal democrat shill.
Ah yes, the mating call of the ecnomically illiterate.
Well, you clearly don't understand the market...it would fundamentally change the current price of oil.
In other words their words of "social justice" roust them from their cover of "I'm A Conservative Republican, But......"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.