Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Emmett McCarthy

My recollections: When General Westmoreland returned (was recalled?) from Vietnam he was given command of the military district encompassing D.C. Given the threats of riots/insurrections, he requested some impossible number of troops (250,000, IIRC) to handle the possibilities.

I was in a battalion of combat engineers at Fort Belvoir and we were given something of a first-response, riot-control duty for the D.C. area. We weren’t involved in what you relate but were at the Pentagon in October of 1967.

Anyone believing the country is some sort of tinderbox today has forgotten the situation in the latter 1960s and the 1970s.


12 posted on 04/06/2008 8:23:34 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: decimon

Yes, we surely had a volatile situation back then. I think that it could very easily happen again. The anti-war crowd has made the effort to rekindle the fire, but doesn’t have the “drawing power” it once did. Two things drew a lot of otherwise uninterested folks to the anti-war stuff back then. Sex and drugs.


13 posted on 04/06/2008 8:49:43 AM PDT by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson