Posted on 04/06/2008 5:27:22 AM PDT by SkyPilot
Boo hoo!
(I just COULDN't resist!)
I can't believe that you STILL cannot or will not tell us just what was UNTRUE about Presbyterianism that Joseph Smith claimed.
Resty,
You are now embarrassing yourself.
OK, you should really talk to a Bishop
for more details about how this happens,
but I’ll help...
bla bla bla....
I really have to ignore your insults AMPU!
***
“Jesus is a descendant of plural marriage as most here on FR in the ancient of day!”
“Was Jesus not a descendant of David and Solomon?”
You really need help on this...
THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MATTHEW CHAPTER 1
Christ is born of Mary—She conceives by the power of the Holy Ghost—Our Lord is named Jesus.
1 The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.
2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren;
3 And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram;
4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon;
5 And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse;
6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias;
But the clutch slips SO badly!
FINALLY!! Someone who can translate Resty speak into English!
Good scriptures, but it really doesn’t answer the question I asked DMS. You’d have to go back and read posts #481, 556, and 562 to understand what the question is related to. In a nutshell, he claims we can be saved based on our good works. I asked him to support what he said with references.
How's this instead... “Jesus’s mortal lineage, that of the House of David, fell under the line that was produced within polygamist relationships.”
That better?
Yeah. you are right, not the same thing. I’m not going back and following this whole thread. I do have a life.
Sorry to butt in.
How's this?
The two 'personages' that spoke to Joseph Smith, fit perfectly the description of Satanic messengers posing as angels of light.
And of course, you have no reason to change at all, right?
You are merely boring me now. Have a nice life.
You are coming across as a blow hart!
If it is the intent of the defense to contend that there is a conspiracy against them by a particular denomination, then a person who happens to be that denomination could easily be argued to be biased, thus disqualified from the jury.
“How’s this instead... “Jesus’s mortal lineage, that of the House of David, fell under the line that was produced within polygamist relationships.”
Good try. A for effort. F for falsehood.
Do they not teach the meaning of words in mormonism?
Is this some mormonism way of trying to justify the wrongness
of polygamy that Joseph Smith introduced into mormonism?
Jesus “line” was not produced within polygamist relationships.
Jesus “line” was “produced” between one man and one woman
in each generation.
It would be truthful to say as I did above, that Jesus’
ancestors included polygamists (who violated God’s command
not to multiply wives).
Why is that so hard?
ampu
Sometimes Elsie, even when you perturb me, I do chuckle at your offerings.
There is good in you yet, I can feel it. Come back from the dark side. ;-)
Look in a mirror sometime.
“You are coming across as a blow hart!”
What’s a blow hart, sweet hart? ;^)
OK, I'll do this one more time, just for you.
Jesus’s mortal line came through the House of David, who's kings practiced polygamy. So, for example, while Nathan and or Solomon, (depending on which genealogy you prefer...Matthew or Luke) were sons to Bathsheba, David had many more wives than her. She wasn't the first, not the last.
That satisfy your intellectual prowess? ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.