Posted on 04/06/2008 5:27:22 AM PDT by SkyPilot
Ah. Well, I am not aware of anyone using it before, since I have only recently been drawn into discussions regarding mormonism. I do not usually get involved in such discussions, nor follow them. I have little doubt that everything I stated has been said before at some time or other.
Same cry I heard in Kirtland after the Lundgren murders! “that’s not MY church....we go to the REAL one”
LDS vs. RLDS
Not to be confused, of course; with those who do it in the open forum.
So let me get this straight, if I can...
God condemns polygamy....
The LDS leadership condemns polygamy....
The Book of Mormon condemns polygamy....
The Mormons on this board support polygamy and use examples of others sins to justify what God and their leaders and their Scripture have condemned.
Sorry, still can’t get it straight. Something is eluding me here. Aren’t they a bit out of touch with their beliefs?
Or perhaps they’re really members of the FLDS and it’s related sects?
The only difference is the ones who do it openly are more brazen, but at least they do not hide their poison and they allow everyone to see what they are.
The same standards should the same for judging all doctrine!
What source do YOU have for backing up what YOU say.
Plenty of people here have posted Scripture to back up their statements> I don't recall you ever doing that.
So if you want back up for the Bible, give me a few minutes to go and dig around my backyard. I do live in Central NY you know. Maybe I can find some more missing gold tablets to support myself.
“Or perhaps they’re really members of the FLDS and it’s related sects?”
I have wondered that, personally. I do not recall them declaring themselves one way or other, but I may have just missed it.
Does the official LDS Church sanction polygamy or forbid it? I would like a clear answer, since so many mormons on here seem to be defending the practice it is a bit confusing.
Which begs the question, why are so many Mormons defending FLDS?
Ouch. LOL.
Something new I had not heard about, and which strikes me as significant (though granted, not as significant as polygamy or marrying pre-pubescent little girls) is something I just learned about on the news last night.
They were saying how secondary wives, who have children, go to the welfare offices and sign up for food stamps as “single” mothers, then give the food to the church. Interesting that such devout, Godly people would be involved in what amounts to fraud and theft from the taxpayers.
When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it. Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.
True. But you summarized it so nicely. Very concise post.
If polygamy were God's design He would have created more women for Adam than just Eve (and please don't bring up mythological Lillith as some LDS apologists seek to do)....and He would not have pronounced the one-flesh concept were a plurality of spouses the design. This command of one wife was also handed down in Deut. 17:17 as the Law was given -17Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold.
Any man hereafter who did so sinned against the Lord and God dealt with them accordingly...David's entire household was destroyed just as one example.
Christ taught in further detail when He stated that if you get a divorce and re-marry then you are committing adultery. How much more so if you were to marry again without getting divorced? Seems this passage is clear proof that God does not recognize plural marriages as anything other than adultery.
This is expanded even more in Ephesians 5: -
31For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.....the word here is TWO SHALL BE ONE, not 3, or 4, or 34 or 44 but TWO. And the word wife is singular, again not plural wives. It does not say joined unto his wives. 32This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.
The relationship between Christ and His Church (Singular, not plural) is the same as God's design for marriage. It doesn't say 'brides' of Christ does it???? (Rev. 21:9; Eph. 5:22-32)
And its further summarized in 1 Timothy 3:2 for the position of being a leader in the church - 2A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, - God established one wife to hold a position of leadership, not plural wives. That's a pretty cut and dried case for monogamy in God's viewpoint.
Oh the depths that men will go to excuse sin out of the depravity of their own hearts..............
Yes, they knew their nakedness, but like any other lie, they did not become Gods. Are you trying to say that the Bible does say that men can become Gods? If so, I find it interesting that you use the words of Satan, as quoted by the Bible, to justify that belief.
My understanding is that it is the official position of the LDS that polygamy is wrong. Some Mormons on this thread have held to that position. Many, who claim to not be FLDS, claim that polygamy is OK.
I believe it all comes down to this:
If the LDS crowd admits that Joseph Smith's sexual encounters with his 27 (some sources say it was as high as 60) "wives" was sinful, tragic , and immoral behavior - then his whole "prophet" halo is stripped away and they have to ask themselves some very hard questions.
Thank you, metmom. That was my understanding to, but I was unsure, considering how many of them seem to be defending polygamy.
Interesting point. Yes, I can see why that would lead so many of them to defend it even though they do not sanction it today. That had not occured to me.
Agreed. Now, if you leave a pile of dog doo in someone's mailbox accusing them of being a "gutless coward drunk!" - that is really an indepth and deeply personal conversation - don't cha know.
Because they don’t believe it’s wrong. It’s just ILLEGAL so they can’t openly practice their beliefs HERE ON EARTH.
Some take the risk. Others wait for the orgy in heaven.
Those that wait can’t condemn because they are all going to be participating at a LATTER DAY.
oy vey!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.