Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING NEWS UPDATE: Authorities enter Eldorado-area temple (Fundamentalist LDS cult)
Go San Angelo ^ | 5 April 08 | Paul A. Anthony

Posted on 04/06/2008 5:27:22 AM PDT by SkyPilot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,621-1,6401,641-1,6601,661-1,680 ... 3,741-3,746 next last
To: wagglebee; sevenbak; Old Mountain man
It is "worldly" to be skeptical about a religion that has as its foundation some gold plates that were translated with two stones all of which have since vanished?

Where the Urim and Thummim that Ezra used, Noah's Ark, or the Ark of the Covenant, and the tablets that Moses received from the Lord?

1,641 posted on 04/09/2008 9:02:28 AM PDT by restornu (Man inhumanity to man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1619 | View Replies]

To: All; prayforpeaceofJerusalem

Trying to hold two opposing stances as if both are valid is a typical cultish trick: on the one hand, the mormonism apologists try to infer Joe Smith married many women other than Emma but did not have ‘sexual congress’ with them because these apologists know that is wrong, while on the other hand they are doing all they can to defend the polygamy of these sleazy fLDS people because they know hoiw close to their church history this modern perversion is. A careful reading of the Torah (commandments against adultery and coveting another man’s wife, etc.) and the Tanach (tradition of bringing the widows and orphans into your household to provide for them but not as fodder for ‘sexual congress’) explodes this Mormon fallacious defense of polygamy into smithereens.


1,642 posted on 04/09/2008 9:06:14 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1640 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

It has always seemed peculiar to me that he would “misplace” the gold plates and magic decoder.

It is also my understanding that the Book of Mormon has been “edited” since its original publication. Now, as we all know, the Bible exists in several translations from the original manuscripts (and a full extant manuscript from the first centuries does not exist) and we know that there are various disagreements between Catholics and Protestants over the Apocrypha, but these are all a result of attempts to modernize from antiquity and the debate over the Apocrypha is about whether it belongs in Canon, not what it says. However, changes in the Book of Mormon have been very significant, the language and style of the Book of Mormon has not changed (there have been some spelling and grammatical changes that the decoder missed), unlike the Bible, the Book of Mormon has had substantive doctrinal changes. Unless they found new plates and decoders, they should not have been able to do this.


1,643 posted on 04/09/2008 9:06:26 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1639 | View Replies]

To: restornu
you twist and lie about what someone said to fit your own agenda!

Have your disagreements but there is no need to rearrange my words so you can undermind or mock!

I copied your EXACT posts, restornu.

HERE

AND HERE

Try coming up with PROOF when you make your nasty accusations against me.

1,644 posted on 04/09/2008 9:07:11 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (An "Inconvenient Truth".....Save the Earth... it's the only planet with chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1631 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Bingo.


1,645 posted on 04/09/2008 9:07:26 AM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1625 | View Replies]

To: restornu
Your adulterous peepstone false prophet claimed to have been given the Urim and Thummim, even fabricating a story coercing others to support it as if the U&T were like a pair of glasses! You should withdraw before you dig too deeply to escape your own pit, Resty.
1,646 posted on 04/09/2008 9:08:43 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1641 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

while on the other hand they are doing all they can to defend the polygamy of these sleazy fLDS people because they know hoiw close to their church history this modern perversion is.

***

You are a fabricator but I will not fret because the Lord is watching all this discussions.

And know those who have sincere concerns, via those who have an agenda to malign!


1,647 posted on 04/09/2008 9:12:25 AM PDT by restornu (Man inhumanity to man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1642 | View Replies]

To: restornu
Where the Urim and Thummim that Ezra used, Noah's Ark, or the Ark of the Covenant, and the tablets that Moses received from the Lord?

I assume you meant to say "where are" these things.

Urim and Thummim of Ezra was several thousand years ago and there is no Biblical mention of what happened. Noah was NEVER instructed to keep track of the Ark's location. The Ark of the Covenant and the Ten Commandments are mentioned many times, the Bible is silent about where they are now (they may be hidden beneath Temple Mount).

However, we're not talking about several thousand years ago, we are talking about less than two hundred years ago. One would think that Smith and his followers would want to hold onto them.

1,648 posted on 04/09/2008 9:14:53 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1641 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

No you didn’t you left out the part about why and I explained it more in post #1610 but that most likely will go over your head!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1997522/posts?page=1610#1610


1,649 posted on 04/09/2008 9:16:35 AM PDT by restornu (Man inhumanity to man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1644 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
U Said: “God Gave David his wives, that means God approved of them, God does not change therefore he still approves of Polygamy. This is a simple point to understand ...”

U Said: “You’ve defended this evil long enough, now.

I am not defending evil, the "males" who did these heinous things to young children should be punished, the physical abuse, mental abuse, sexual abuse, all of it should be punished. would this even be news if the women involved got married when they were thirty? No age is definitely an issue, such "Marriages" are clearly illegal even if they were not polygamous, Such incarceration is illegal, abuse in its many and varied forms as practiced by these Males (I refuse to call them men) is illegal and reprehensible, but it is disingenuous to lump it in with polygamy which is not immoral according to the Bible, and call that Immoral too, you might as well condemn all who drive the same model of truck as these people drove the girls around in.

U Said: “It is time you stopped to look at what the obligation of David was when Saul was slain. God did not give David an obligation to ‘raise up children unto Saul’ thus there was no admonition to have sexual congress with Saul’s wives and concubines. Refer to Hebrew Torah/Tenach. David WAS given an obligation to bring these under a household protection rather than turning them out into poverty. David’s sexual congress with them was his sin, not something God ordained.

On this point, we could agree, however, God gave him wives, as you here admit, what about the Wives David married on his own? Were they to live in Coventry as well? Did God or Did God not Command husbands and wives to procreate? Why were so many of the patriarchs in the Bible polygamous? Why were these men still chosen by God to lead his people? Abraham, Moses, Jacob, virtually all the hallowed names in the OT were polygamous, and now you want to tell me it's not biblical, well, show me a scripture that condemns Polygamy, and not the one about divorce, because serial polygamy is practiced today without the blink of an eye, start condemning that, and I might listen about that scripture applying to polygamy where you stay married to your first wife.

Come on MHG, show me a scripture, you should be able to do that, you are obviously highly educated and well read in the scriptures, show me a scripture or admit that I just might have a point.

U Said: You mormonism apologists disgust me sometimes, DU.

Likewise you Mormon Assaulter's, so?

U Said: How can you continue to defend polygamy even in your perverted way with this story glaring at people?

Because it's not the polygamy that was wrong, you guys are assaulting driving because of a drugged up driver who was speeding while driving on the wrong side of the road.

Polygamy is biblical and moral and illegal, Abortion is unbiblical, immoral and legal. Let's not confuse legal with moral, I for one refuse to allow the pack of miscreants we call government decide for me what is moral.

I am prepared to discuss this on logical and reasonable grounds, I will not assume that Law = Morality, in fact I think that often today Law = Immorality, show me a scripture that actually says what you are saying that Polygamy is immoral and I will fold my tent and cross the road, don't and I stand firm, in the support of God's established patterns as I have observed them, regardless of today's societal norms
1,650 posted on 04/09/2008 9:21:37 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1551 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
"The souls of people are at stake here - and that is what is most important to Christ"

This is not the 700 Club. This is not primarily a forum for trying to convert souls for Christ.

Although converting souls for Christ may be the most important activity that one can engage in, even the most ardent evangelist takes time out to shower, shave, eat, and engage in normal commerce and non-religious discussions.

When you are being checked out at the grocery store, do you always make a point and ask the cashier whether or not they are born again?

When you go to the polling place to vote, do you ask each of the poll watchers whether or not they are justified by faith alone?

I have never read a single post where a person has said "Aha! Now you have convinced me. I will turn my life over to Christ".

I have seen numerous posts, however, where someone has come around to the other side of the immigration issue, or an economic issue, or something related to education.

This is not a particularly good forum for proselytizing.

It does seem lateley, however, to be a great forum for self-righteousness and sectarianism.

1,651 posted on 04/09/2008 9:32:11 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1527 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“However, we’re not talking about several thousand years ago, we are talking about less than two hundred years ago. One would think that Smith and his followers would want to hold onto them. “


Heck, people keep their family bibles longer than that.

I still use tools from the 1800s because I got them cheap from garage sales and they are so common.

I think my meat cleaver is from the 1830s, and it is in my kitchen right now.

I still own and read books that predate those holiest of artifacts from this American cult that was created about 65 years before that Japanese woman that died last Saturday, was born.


1,652 posted on 04/09/2008 9:32:58 AM PDT by ansel12 (If your profit margin relies on criminality to suppress wages, then you deserve to be out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1648 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
'The LDS Organization, Inc.® was started by an ignorant, 14 yo farmboy, with no bible knowledge, being deceived by two satanic messangers"

And there are those that say that Christianity was started by a bored middle-class carpenter who spent a little too much time in the company of men.

1,653 posted on 04/09/2008 9:33:35 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1542 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; DelphiUser; sevenbak

We have copies of scriptures from thousands of years of ago.

What we don’t have is a kind of D&C when, why, and how those revelations or scripture was given.

Many here don’t like to go back connect the dots and see their are many dots missing.

Many like to mock the messenger or message like when I said not many here do Critical Thinking and gave a definition which all made fun of me, because I did not give the source which I thought it would be obvious it is from some form of dictionary or wiki.

After all that raking me over the coals the main point was Critical Thinking was dismissed from this forum for it would mean being responsible for our words!

You think that gives you a pass because something was thousand of years ago well it does not!


1,654 posted on 04/09/2008 9:34:01 AM PDT by restornu (Man inhumanity to man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1648 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I agree.
As I stated in a former post to a defender of the religion who posted what his religion “now” says about Jesus [but they still miss the message/doctrine that the rulers in Israel missed, as so stated by YHWH in Isaiah 28:12, and so were given blindness of understanding, in Isaiah 29:14], their religion evolves and one cannot hold what they believe in the hand no more than one can hold smoke in the hand.

That is the reason I will not debate what they believe, for it can change with the next -so called- living prophet’s establishment. The younger generations have no idea of the true history of the founding doctrines and of the continuing changes in that doctrine and of the re-writing of their books and the deletions and additions to them.They do not even care, in the main, for if they cared, they would not keep silence and comply with the cover-ups.
Watching one video on ABC internet linked to from here, of the women in that compound and their attitude to the media [and so to the world], by their swearing and cursing at the cameras, I realized that brainwashed adults will not be swayed but by a miracle of their own hearts’ wanting truth, and seeking truth. Jesus promised that He who seeks, finds.


1,655 posted on 04/09/2008 9:38:58 AM PDT by prayforpeaceofJerusalem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1643 | View Replies]

To: restornu
No you didn’t you left out the part about why and I explained it more in post #1610 but that most likely will go over your head!

It's not up to me to try to pull you out of the hole you dug for yourself by proclaiming "I have said many times that plural marriage in many ways was a beautiful things." I posted your exact posts.

1610 states: "It is through this portal that the souls of the Lord enter the earth this is why I say it is a beautiful thing because of the caliber souls that come to earth under this Celestial law."

1,656 posted on 04/09/2008 9:38:59 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (No more "hate the sin but love the sinner" but "love the POLYGAMY sin" and hate the sinner.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1649 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

My family has a few family Bibles that predate 1830 and, unlike the fabled gold plates, there was nothing special or unique about these Bibles when my ancestors first purchased them. We’re talking about golden plates that God told you how to find and translate, one would think that this is something you would keep track of.


1,657 posted on 04/09/2008 9:39:15 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1652 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; wagglebee
It is still taught and it is anticipated that all good Mormons will one day be polygamists (in the afterlife), and if a new revelation is given if polygamy ever becomes legal in the US, then they will pick up where they left off.

There, fixed it for you.

1,658 posted on 04/09/2008 9:46:15 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1602 | View Replies]

To: prayforpeaceofJerusalem

There’s no record of Abraham marrying Hagar. It was clear that he was wrong and used her slave. Having sex with some one is not a marriage ceremony and Hagar was never referred to as his wife.

Getting remarried after the death of a spouse is not polygamy. It’s perfectly legal and even God does not condemn it.

It’s not how many total, it’s how many at a time only due to death. Anything else is adultery.


1,659 posted on 04/09/2008 9:49:08 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1613 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

“And there are those that say that Christianity was started by a bored middle-class carpenter who spent a little too much time in the company of men.”


I would like to see that historical source, do you have a link for the bored guy.

I personally doubt that Christ was ever bored.


1,660 posted on 04/09/2008 9:50:11 AM PDT by ansel12 (If your profit margin relies on criminality to suppress wages, then you deserve to be out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1653 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,621-1,6401,641-1,6601,661-1,680 ... 3,741-3,746 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson