Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Conservatives Warn against Romney as McCain's VP
CNSNews.com ^ | April 04, 2008 | Penny Starr

Posted on 04/04/2008 6:39:47 PM PDT by neverdem

alt

Social Conservatives Warn against Romney as McCain's VP
By Penny Starr
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
April 04, 2008

(CNSNews.com) - In a full-page letter ad that will run Saturday in an Arizona newspaper where Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) will be on the presidential campaign trail, leading social conservatives warn the GOP hopeful against picking Mitt Romney as his vice presidential running mate. Click to see full quote

"I know (Romney) to be a very dangerous and deceitful person," Gregg Jackson told Cybercast News Service about his reasons for helping draft and signing the open-letter style ad.

"He's the only one to establish abortion on demand for $50 as part of his very own socialist health care plan," Jackson said, referring to the plan put into place in Massachusetts when Romney was governor of the state.

Jackson, author of "Conservative Comebacks to Liberal Lies" and a talk show host on WRKO in Boston, said Romney is the most liberal of all the presidential candidates, including Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

Conservative activist Paul Weyrich, who supported Romney when he was in the presidential race, also signed the letter.

"We were very grateful when (Weyrich) came to see the light," Peter LaBarbera, founder of Republicans for Family Values and president of Americans for Truth, told Cybercast News Service.

LaBarbera and Jackson joined 24 others in signing the letter, a group that also included J. Matt Barber of Concerned Women for America and William J. Murray of the Religious Freedom Coalition.

LaBarbera said social conservatives want McCain to nominate "somebody that has solid pro-family and pro-life credentials."

Jackson said he had no doubts about the significance of McCain's VP choice.

"(McCain) will not win unless he can effectively mobilize and energize the GOP base, euphemistically called 'value voters' or Evangelical Christians," Jackson said. "There are 40 million of us, and I say, 'Hey Pal, if you want my vote, you'd better pick an authentically conservative running mate.'

"We don't want Hillary Clinton dressed up in a Reagan suit," he added.

Make media inquiries or request an interview about this article.

Subscribe to the free CNSNews.com daily E-Brief.

E-mail a comment or news tip to Penny Starr

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.

Copyright 1998-2006 Cybercast News Service


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; mccain; romney; socialconservatives
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: gunservative
You’ll have President Romney happening before 2012 if he’s the Veep.

I guess one can hope.

21 posted on 04/04/2008 7:14:59 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

The only person I ever heard of in that ad is Paul Weyrich. I appreciate these people and their work, but they certainly aren’t big name conservatives.

I am a social conservative who voted for and supported Mitt. I liked Fred or Mitt, and when Fred faded, I went to Mitt.

I really think it is pitiful that some conservatives can’t believe Mitt had a change of heart. Their refusal to listen to his story and their refusal to listen to even the pro-choice people who ripped Mitt after he became governor of Massachusetts is astounding to me.

Oh well, whatever.

IMO, McCain has to choose someone more conservative than him. Mitt fits that bill, but whoever he chooses, he has to be from the right.


22 posted on 04/04/2008 7:16:34 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zeebee
handsome, articulate and young enough.

That could fit Obama too.

23 posted on 04/04/2008 7:20:17 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

We here in Ohio never got to vote for Mitt or anyone else for that matter since McCain was already the shoe in.
I’d say Mitt would fair very well here in Ohio which has been a pretty important state in the last few Presidential elections...


24 posted on 04/04/2008 7:22:44 PM PDT by oust the louse (Terrorists are salivating over a Clinton or Obama White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; Jim Robinson; Tony Snow; Buckhead; wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; ...
Like father, like son. Mitt got brainwashed somehow into believing that he could actually win the GOP nomination.

Add in Thompson and Huckabee for the title of the real conservative in GOP primaries that are open to donkeys and independents, and guess who screwed themselves?

Attn McCain Apologists: Talk all you want! (Vanity)

IMHO, I don't think that there were that many McCain Apologists on this forum. Looking at Operation Chaos in the continuing donkey primary contest, we can expect more of the same idiocy unless the GOP restricts its primaries to only registered well in advance GOP voters, like they do in NY. I had to register by early October 2007 to vote in the 2008 NY GOP primary.

RNC Last Chance to Fix 2012 Primaries

As I wrote back in January, “According to a Fox News exit poll, 32% of the Michigan Republican primary voters identified themselves as independents or Democrats. Another Fox exit poll showed 20% of the South Carolina Republican primary voters said they were either Democrats or independents. In Michigan, Gov. Romney won with 39%, Sen. McCain was second at 30% and Gov. Huckabee third at 16%. In South Carolina, John McCain won with 33% of the vote, Mike Huckabee had 30% and Fred Thompson had 16%. Given those margins, it’s pretty clear that the Dems and independents controlled the result in both states.”

In New Hampshire, the results were the same. According to Fox News exit polls, 39% of New Hampshire’s independents were voting GOP ballots. Sen. McCain won by about 5.5% over Gov. Romney in New Hampshire. Again, the independents apparently controlled the results.

By allowing cross-over voting, the Republican Party is enabling liberals to choose its nominee. Just as conservatives demand our borders be secure against illegal aliens, conservatives insist that Republicans -- and only Republicans -- choose the Republican nominee for president.

If the GOP doesn't close the primaries and caucuses, to whatever extent that the GOP uses the latter in its nomination process, expect more of the same in 2012.

From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

25 posted on 04/04/2008 7:40:29 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

handsome, articulate and young enough.

That could fit Obama too.


When the prompter is turned on, yeah, Obama is articulate. Off the cuff, he’s incoherent.


26 posted on 04/04/2008 7:42:29 PM PDT by CZB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The SoCon’s might think Romney is a closet lib, but it’s what McCain thinks that counts, and I bet he thinks Romney is way too CONSERVATIVE for the Veep pick. That Chistie Todd Whitman rumor the other day sounded more like McCain’s idea of a pick to me. Or maybe McChurian will wait until Hillary becomes free. He’s gonna spend ALL his time running for her voters anyway, so why not just ask her to be Veep.

We’re so screwed.


27 posted on 04/04/2008 7:47:13 PM PDT by CZB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CZB

Well, if he really wants to please social conservatives, he should go with someone like Allen Keyes.


28 posted on 04/04/2008 7:49:25 PM PDT by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
IMO, McCain has to choose someone more conservative than him.

Well put Recovering_Democrat, that is the pivot to McCain's credence as a Republican.

29 posted on 04/04/2008 7:50:23 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter
The primary, It should be weighted by county. Winner take all gave us a Nasty Narcissistic Democrat.
30 posted on 04/04/2008 7:55:14 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter
General question: Is anyone ready to do away with “Winner take all” in the Republican Primaries?

Is anyone completely satisfied with “Winner take all” in the Republican Primaries??

Look at the mess that the proportional system has given the donkeys this year. Do you want that for the GOP? IMHO, closing the GOP nominating system to GOP registered voters is a better idea. See comment# 25, please.

31 posted on 04/04/2008 7:59:11 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
I think if you look at the signatories of the letter, you will find an unusually high representation of the Huckabee folks. And, after all, wasn't he running for VP from the get-go??
32 posted on 04/04/2008 8:00:30 PM PDT by MCCRon58 (A man unwilling to fight for freedom and liberty, deserve neither. (Ain't much of a man, either))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Kuksool; LdSentinal

IMHO, Mitt Romney is the wrong choice for McCain’s VP. He has major credibility problems, especially with the conservatives McCain needs to win the election.


33 posted on 04/04/2008 8:04:14 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Those in the national Republican leadership do the work of three men- Moe, Larry, and Curly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

*omney can be Obama’s running mate. They’re perfect together. Liars, liberals, and they destroy everything they touch.


34 posted on 04/04/2008 8:12:54 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~***Just say NO to the "O"***~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

>> handsome, articulate and young enough.
> That could fit Obama too.

Obama is /too/ young.


35 posted on 04/04/2008 8:16:04 PM PDT by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: zeebee; CZB

A pretty gift wrapped package is attractive but I’m more concerned with what is in the box.


36 posted on 04/04/2008 8:19:18 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
McCain/Lieberman -08, it's the only choice that makes any sense. McCain is not going to unite the party and unless I've missed a lot he isn't even trying to. Lieberman pulls the Dems who can't handle bama or Hillary and he kicks in the balance of the independents that John McAmnesty didn't already have. It is the only play I can see that puts McCain in the White House no matter who he's running against.
37 posted on 04/04/2008 8:30:19 PM PDT by kublia khan (Absolute war brings total victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
J. C. Watts. That's the ticket.

With J. C. Watts character is king.

38 posted on 04/04/2008 8:32:15 PM PDT by harpo11 (Rush, had better have a back-up strategy just in case the third term grabbing Clintons win the WH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Absolutely. I would have a VERY difficult time voting for the ticket if Romney were placed on it.

In my opinion, we need a very strong Southern governor.......striaght laced and very, very conservative.


39 posted on 04/04/2008 8:33:57 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpo11

Ditto with J.C. Watts. Then I’ll vote on the hope McCain dies in office.


40 posted on 04/04/2008 8:38:26 PM PDT by Uhaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson