Posted on 04/02/2008 8:47:10 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
Clinton Testimony on FBI Files Blocked Apr 2 11:20 AM US/Eastern WASHINGTON (AP) - A federal judge has rejected an effort to force Hillary Rodham Clinton to testify in a decade-old lawsuit over White House acquisition of FBI background files.
The court ruling spares Clinton a politically sensitive deposition at a time when she is fighting to overtake Barack Obama in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination.
The lawsuit is over the Clinton White House's acquisition of hundreds of FBI files on Republican appointees to White House jobs in previous administrations. The conservative group Judicial Watch accused the former first lady of masterminding a conspiracy and has been trying to question her for years.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Leave it to you to shoot your mouth off, so to speak, before doing any research of your own.
Not only that, you didn't even bother reading through the subsequent replies on this thread that confirm the data presented before doing so.
You get credit for not calling us knee jerk, ignorant, clueless, fools or some such though.
While we are at it, when will we see all of her papers during her first and second terms as co-president? We have a right to assess her judgement, her positions, and her advice since she is telling us about her 35 years experience, and especially her experience as first lady qualifies her for the office of the president and CIC.
Where's the proof?
and ya all had the same thought
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.