Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

B'rer McCain and the Briar Patch
American Thinker ^ | 4-1-08 | Clarice Feldman - Commentary

Posted on 03/31/2008 10:33:45 PM PDT by smoothsailing

April 01, 2008

B'rer McCain and the Briar Patch

By Clarice Feldman

In the classic Song of the South the wily rabbit begs the fox not to throw him into the briar patch knowing (what the fox doesn't) that he can easily escape the bushes' thorns and jump off to freedom, and that the fox will certainly do what he has begged him not to do.

I loathe the co-called Campaign Finance Reform Act sponsored jointly by Senators McCain and Feingold after an unethical, if not illegal, largely sub rosa campaign by the tax exempt Pew Foundation. To me the Act is an unconstitutional abomination, but the Democrats, who had clearly pre-arranged their end run on the Act's strictures by creating countless 527 organizations (many of which were up and running when the Act took effect), no doubt figured that Senator McCain was their perfect patsy to spearhead the passage of this legislation which they could pawn off as a bipartisan clean government move.

We've now had time to see it in operation and know the 527s, in fact, can say and do almost whatever they choose in federal elections. They are not to coordinate with candidates' campaigns in their actions, but no one can look at big operations like MoveOn and say with a straight fact that this hard-to-enforce limitation has worked out well.

Media empowerment

The Act substantially increases the power of the media, which can say whatever it chooses whenever it chooses, and which increasingly has been playing a corruptly partisan role in federal elections.

While the media has completely unfettered free speech and the 527 speech limitations seem toothless and minor and unenforceable, the Act imposes intolerable restraints on citizen free speech when it is most significant-in the period just before federal elections.

Foreign money in our elections

There's more to hate about the Act, of course. For one thing, a loophole permits foreign money to be contributed to 527s which can and do play a large election role when all prior legislation absolutely banned foreign money in our elections. Nor does the Act limit contributions to 527s. Thus it allows people like George Soros and his friends to contribute literally millions and millions of dollars to affect elections, obviating, it seems to me, the very impetus for the Act -- keeping big money out of our elections. It makes a mockery of another stated purpose as well -- making these contributions more opaque.

Replacing sunshine with darkness

In fact, it is ever harder to keep track of the sources of campaign funds when they are being funneled into so many organizations as opposed to just the parties' and candidates' coffers. Being caught at major violations of the Act in any event has resulted in little more than a wrist slap of a penalty. In effect, to the corrupt it is merely a license fee to continue violating the law. Even more ridiculous is the fact that because of a deadlock in Congress the federal agency (the Federal Election Commission) which is to oversee all this lacks a quorum and can do nothing to oversee the coming presidential election.

Bre'r McCain

McCain played a key role in the drafting and passing of this ridiculous legislation, designed to help the Democrats as it limited a cherished Constitutional freedom. So why do I compare him to B'rer Rabbit?

The Act's very weaknesses create countless new centers of power -- political and economic clout -- independent of the parties. This means that Howard Dean, even if he had the will and talent to prevent his party's coming train wreck, can do little to prevent it.

But wait, there's more.

The new legislation spurred and emboldened and empowered countless fringe groups who'd been severely marginalized under the old big party system and old finance laws. In the Republican case, these groups have often been useful adjuncts to the campaigns. The Swift Boat Veterans for Truth comes to mind. It played an estimable role in the last election, and for all the smears directed to it, that group was responsible and creditable and advanced the candidate's interests in discrediting the Democrat nominee, John F. Kerry whose record the media was hiding.

But for the Democrats, the new legislation seems to have encouraged the creation of countless nutty fringe groups, largely on the left: Kos and MoveOn exemplifying my point. These groups have concentrated their fire, not on the opposition party, but like the French revolutionaries, on the moderates in their own party like Senator Lieberman. They favor unelectable candidates like Lamont who curry their favor and share their fringe beliefs.

The more the Democratic Party gets pushed off to the left, the less likely it is to prevail in any general election. In my opinion, the media cannot cover for the months to come the truth about Obama's record and beliefs. (Certainly not with his opponent rubbing it under their nose.) He is far to the left of the majority of American voters.

Now it is true that Hillary Clinton might still get her party's nomination, but to get it she's had to abandon what was her best strategy to become President. Instead she's been forced to target her message to the same left wing of the party who dominate the primaries. Her plan had clearly been to stay a bit fuzzier on the hot issues in this period so that she could more easily slip slide to the middle for the general election. Her debate gaffe on drivers' licenses for illegal aliens exposed that strategy, rendering it pretty much null for the remainder of the nomination period. She and Obama are now singing a variation of the song from Annie Get Your Gun: "Anything you can say, I can say lefter."

So it seems to me that ironically McCain-Feingold which seemed a gift to the Democrats may well be a briar patch that allows McCain to leap off to victory but ensnare his opposition which thought it would hurt Republican candidates.

I asked my friend Soylent Red what he thought of my theory. He responded:

"Decentralization of process typically improves the process over time. Free speech issues aside, it will force both parties to confront and mainstream their fringes in order to preserve electability..."

Well, maybe, I think. But right now I'm looking at the short term and to me in this legal framework, the fox has been outfoxed.

......................

Clarice Feldman is an attorney in Washington, DC.

......................

Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/brer_mccain_and_the_briar_patc_1.html at April 01, 2008 - 01:27:35 AM EDT


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 527s; briarpatch; cfr; feingold; mccain; reforminstitute; rmsp; soros

1 posted on 03/31/2008 10:33:46 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
For one thing, a loophole permits foreign money to be contributed to 527s which can and do play a large election role when all prior legislation absolutely banned foreign money in our elections. Nor does the Act limit contributions to 527s. Thus it allows people like George Soros and his friends to contribute literally millions and millions of dollars to affect elections, obviating, it seems to me, the very impetus for the Act -- keeping big money out of our elections. It makes a mockery of another stated purpose as well -- making these contributions more opaque.

--

bears repeating, Thanks for posting.

We all know McCain is clean as snow when it comes to Soros. Right? some coincidences are too coincidental, imo.

2 posted on 03/31/2008 10:52:41 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
So it seems to me that ironically McCain-Feingold which seemed a gift to the Democrats may well be a briar patch that allows McCain to leap off to victory but ensnare his opposition which thought it would hurt Republican candidates.

Very interesting, because though the Republicans may have their fringe groups, it's easy to see that they're fringe, because they're so out of the mainstream of the Republicans, and different from McCain. With the Democrats, it's really hard to see much difference between their fringe groups and their candidates, and that's going to be up front for everyone to see in the next few months.

3 posted on 03/31/2008 10:54:40 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Interesting........


4 posted on 03/31/2008 10:59:36 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

As much as I detest osama obama & the hildebeast, I can’t stand McPain either. He’s an adulterer. A month after divorcing his first wife who worked on his behalf while he was a POW, he (43) married his 2nd wife (25) who happens to be 18 years younger and very wealthy. She stole drugs and developed an addiction. Being married to him I can understand why. He’s like sKerry who lives on his wife’s money, a leech. Plus, his policies stink. Here’s an article entitled “Explaining McCain” from 2000 http://www.worldmag.com/articles/article.cfm?eid=0A7DFB30-E1ED-7574-C615544CD9482334.


5 posted on 04/01/2008 4:05:47 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
Will you be voting in the Presidential Election?
6 posted on 04/01/2008 11:19:34 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Yes. If there’s a place for write in, I’m writing in my name. I’d rather vote for myself than either of the 3 stooges.


7 posted on 04/01/2008 11:26:48 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
I here you, and I understand I suppose. I don't care for any of them either.

Photobucket

... but I'll end up voting for the guy in the middle.

8 posted on 04/01/2008 12:07:16 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Ping.


9 posted on 04/01/2008 2:58:33 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson