Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Living with staggering violence in South L.A.
Los Angeles Times ^ | March 28, 2008 | Scott Gold, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

Posted on 03/30/2008 6:11:12 AM PDT by Haddit

Hines has pleaded not guilty to a series of felonies that could bring him a life prison term. Police are still searching for the intended victims, who have not come forward.

Hines is a Four Trey Crip, said Los Angeles Police Lt. Paul Stalker, commanding officer of detectives in the department's Newton Division, which covers 10 square miles of South Los Angeles, a shifting mosaic of gang territories.

The gunman's intended victims, investigators believe, were probably Bloods, perhaps members of a branch called AFC, or "All for Crime." Generally, Bloods control the east side of Central and Crips the west. Latino gangs -- 38th Street, Playboys, Barrio Mojados -- are sprinkled on both sides. The avenue is a spine of tension and, routinely, staggering violence.

"You've just got to keep moving," Pruitt said. "The strong survive."

The shooting shocked the city, but around here, most say it was an aberration only in the sense that the outside world noticed.

Many residents say they can predict everything that will happen now. There will be community meetings, calls for reform -- for jobs programs, mentoring programs, after-school programs. Solemn promises will be made. Police will put more cars on the streets. Violence will ebb. And then, before real change can take root, the city's attention will begin to drift, and a new cycle will begin.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; 40; banglist; bluezone; ccw; gangs; losangeles; order; rkba; southcentral; special
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: robertpaulsen
Roberpaulson posted:

“You mention alcohol and murder rates. Are you saying that the murder rate has climbed every year since 1970 (the Controlled Substances Act)? From your graph, the murder rate climbed until 1970, then leveled off.
So, I don't get it. What's your point?”

------------------------------------------------ It appears that you are positing a straw man: The drug war was well underway by 1970.

“In December of 1964, having been ratified by 40 countries, the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs 1961 went into effect restricting narcotic drug use to medical and scientific purposes. It also internationally banned narcotic drug trade outside of government monopolies.[8] History was about to repeat itself. From 1964 to 1970 in the United States, the number of state prisoners incarcerated for drug offenses more than doubled from 3,079 to 6,596 (it was 90,000 in 1989)[9], and the new concentration on enforcing victimless crimes caused the homicide rate to skyrocket. Between 1964 and 1970 the homicide rate doubled from 5 per 100,000 to 10 per 100,000, where it has remained, with minor fluctuations, until today.[2] Lyndon Johnson had declared war on drugs, to be followed by Richard Nixon declaring War on Drugs in 1969, Ronald Reagan declaring War on Drugs in 1982, and George Bush declaring War on Drugs in 1989.[4]”

41 posted on 03/30/2008 8:47:50 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

“And if you were around in the 20’s you would have said, “And they could end all this tomorrow by decriminalizing alcohol.”

And he would be correct.

Prohibition was the catalyst and the vehicle for taking common street punks and organizing them into sophisticated criminal organizations that exist to this day.

History is repeating itself.


42 posted on 03/30/2008 8:51:43 AM PDT by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

This problem has been around for decades.
I remember back in 80’s in college sociology class.
I had discussion with very honest professor.
His explanation of problem.
Citizens in depressed areas tolerate crime, due to distrust of police and government.
Crime,drugs provide a form of income for those that cannot or will not get full time job.
It also provides for underground economy.
In addition in most of these communities people who are being victimized by gangs have a family member in gangs also.
Therefore if they rat out one gang retaliation comes in form of dead family member.
This situtaion perpetuates problem.
When I asked what could be done.
He answer was that the only way to end violence was to eliminate all gangs in said area.
Eliminate as in kill, no trials.
Further discussion with professor, he said that politicians and police had no incentive to end problem.
Politicians because they can always run on tougher anti gang platform.
Police because if they eliminate threats to community,they are not needed.

Pretty grim assessment of situation, but one I have never forgotten.


43 posted on 03/30/2008 9:19:17 AM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

Careful there Seruzawa, when you start twitching and can’t stand still, when your eyes wander all over the place, when you develop a nervous sound in your voice and when you become spontaneously hostile for no apparent reason, it may be too late for you to get off of drugs.


44 posted on 03/30/2008 9:34:38 AM PDT by Haddit (A Hunter Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: EEDUDE
"History is repeating itself."

So, legalizing alcohol did NOT get rid of organized crime. But legalizing drugs will. Uh-huh.

45 posted on 03/30/2008 9:57:29 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
"The drug war was well underway by 1970."

Before 1970, most drugs were legal. The DEA didn't even come into existence until 1973!

46 posted on 03/30/2008 10:01:18 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Robertpaulson posted:

“Before 1970, most drugs were legal. The DEA didn’t even come into existence until 1973!”


Did you bother reading the posted reply?

Here is is again:

“From 1964 to 1970 in the United States, the number of state prisoners incarcerated for drug offenses more than doubled from 3,079 to 6,596 (it was 90,000 in 1989)[9], and the new concentration on enforcing victimless crimes caused the homicide rate to skyrocket. Between 1964 and 1970 the homicide rate doubled from 5 per 100,000 to 10 per 100,000, where it has remained, with minor fluctuations, until today.[2] Lyndon Johnson had declared war on drugs, to be followed by Richard Nixon declaring War on Drugs in 1969,”


47 posted on 03/30/2008 10:39:06 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
"and the new concentration on enforcing victimless crimes"

I said, that didn't happen until the mid-70's. If the murder rate increased before then, it was for other reasons.

"Between 1964 and 1970 the homicide rate doubled from 5 per 100,000 to 10 per 100,000, where it has remained, with minor fluctuations, until today"

"Today" being 1989. Well, from 1989 to 2005, the homicide rate dropped back down to around 5 per 100,000. Go figure.

48 posted on 03/30/2008 10:59:33 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

“Today” being 1989. Well, from 1989 to 2005, the homicide rate dropped back down to around 5 per 100,000. Go figure.”


A lot happened since 1989, including the major increase in the number of states with Concealed Carry Permits. It appears that about 10 % of the decrease has been due to concealed carry.

What is also interesting is that we seem to be stuck at the 5/100,000 figure, when it was 1/100,000 back before WWI.


49 posted on 03/30/2008 11:18:07 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

I don’t blame the people who are afraid to report crime.....didn’t Italians and the Irish in New York basically ho-hum crime so as not to anger the mob rulers?


50 posted on 03/30/2008 10:07:15 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: junkman_106
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

What the hell is that supposed to mean? What “war on freedom” ?

The probation of drugs, "The war on drugs". Taking the rights of a person to live as they want. The only thing it does is create a black market aka. crime. If drugs were not illegal the there would not be fighting over turf to sell them. The war on freedom aka guns drugs and your income.

51 posted on 03/31/2008 5:43:06 AM PDT by Total Package (TOLEDO, OHIO THE MRSA INFECTION IN THE STATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Wow. It took some shoehorning to get it in there, but thanks for my new tagline.


52 posted on 04/01/2008 4:46:52 PM PDT by papertyger (The left fosters lawlessness & bad culture by denying the legitimacy of the law and Western culture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nailbiter

Powerful, still thinking about those statements. WOW..sounds as if he was right.


53 posted on 04/01/2008 4:55:33 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

Thanks,

That is quite a compliment.


54 posted on 04/01/2008 6:47:56 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson