Legal TEAM Arrives to Meet with ex-Governor Spitzer.....
Posted on 03/30/2008 6:04:22 AM PDT by Liz
When it comes to Eliot Spitzer's scandalous Dirty Tricks, Soares is backpedaling like a drunken bicycle racer headed for the finish line. Soares was complicit in covering up the affair. Soares manipulated the incident from the getgo---he recently demanded a waiver from Doobie Dave the governor to use Spitzer administration documents so Soares can "fully air the relevant information uncovered during our investigation." But it was only six months ago, Soares was practically nominating Robespierre Spitzer for sainthood - with his report that all but absolved the ex-governor (and his henchmen, too) from significant wrongdoing in that sordid Dirty Tricks affair.
Whore-fixated Spitzer was forced out in disgrace, his credibility lower than a snake in the grass. The true story of Spitzer's Dirty Tricks emerges despite Soares' efforts to cover it up. Contrary to DA Soares' lying assertions, Spitzer was indeed a chief motivating force which sought to use the State Police to gather information. Soares is another cog in Spitzer's Reign of Terror machine.
Truly Clintonian! Take the moral high road while slithering in the gutter, abusing power, and generally being - there is only one word for it Clintonian.
FR bookmark , .. .. and thanks Liz
{ btw ,.. Albany , and some of the towns around there , like Latham , appear to have a hard time shaking the “bootlegger” ways and manners }
He’s lived in the US since he was 6. Maybe you can indict his behavior in office without bringing bigotry quite so strongly into your post.
This clown needs to resign as well or be forced from office,now!When will the dominoes stop falling? He got a pay-off, pure and simple.Money,jobs for his whole family,who knows?Disgraceful; and all because a bank employee did the right thing and reported Spitzer’s funny business.
A Democrat called him a boob, and he most certainly qualifies as using a Third World mentality. Are you defending him? Or are you defending Spitzer?
That’s really funny. (Well, maybe really pathetic, but still funny.)
I’m not defending either one of them, I’m objecting to bigotry.
Reminds me of the Stooges’ law firm of Dewey, Cheatum and Howe.
***************
What bigotry?
"Somewhere down the line if we have no other way out that is something any defense attorney would have to consider," he said yesterday.
Sounds like you might want to complain to the Democrat that called him the boob.
Yeah---a bunch of shady bootleggers---that about sums it up.
Calling someone a “boob” is not bigotry. If I assert, for example, that you are a boob, that is not bigotry. If I assert that you are an inbred mountain cretin like most of those hillbillies, then that would be bigotry. Do you see the difference? Taking someone’s ethnic heritage, abstracting a negative quality from it based on stereotype or caricature, and then applying it as a blanket condemnation of anyone who might be so unfortunate as to share that person’s heritage, is bigotry.
I’m trying to figure out where your coming from here, what bigotry? Who’s lived here since 6 years old?
Soares' law school dean.
Nice deconstruction.....deserves a repeat.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.