I guess I don't think its important whether Richardson was clean in this. Did he sell out to the Clintons or sell the Clintons out. No matter what the realities of the situation are, they're not important. The biggest issue here is that the perceived breach loyalty, whether real or not, is a huge crime to Carville. In Carville's world of crony-ism, Loyalty is how we pick Presidents. Notice the total lack of comment on issues or best person for the job. In other words, there is no required loyalty to the American people.
Its like an atheist talking ethics. Carville doesn't understand the base levels of loyalty in politics. In Carville's mind God and Country come after favoritism assuming they come at all.
“I guess I don’t think its important whether Richardson was clean in this.”
Ahhhh, there lies our difference. I do. I don’t like any disloyalty from anyone for any reason. It turns my stomach.
Other than that, I do believe we are on the same page!