Skip to comments.
A Euro-army is fantasy land. We need our American ally
The Guardian ^
| March 29 2008
| Martin Kettle
Posted on 03/29/2008 6:17:18 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
If Europe's GDP exceeds ours, shouldn't their defense spending, as well? It's not 1948 anymore, it's 2008.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The gravest threat that the euros face lurks in the nearest mosque. NATO is helpless in the face of the kind of cowardice that smiles and calls itsself ‘tolerance.’
2
posted on
03/29/2008 6:23:14 AM PDT
by
Clioman
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“If Europe's GDP exceeds ours, shouldn't their defense spending, as well? It's not 1948 anymore, it's 2008.”
Thank you!
And those 75K troops stationed in Germany would be of better use in Iraq & Afghanistan.
3
posted on
03/29/2008 6:30:22 AM PDT
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
We spend more on defense than the rest of NATO put together. In fact, we almost spend more than the rest of the world put together. Europe would like to continue to be on Security Welfare. The problem is that the US will soon be in the position of Europe, i.e., trying to decide between guns or butter.
Our entitlement systems are going belly up. If nothing is done, by 2060, the combination of Social Security and Medicare will account for more than 71 percent of the federal budget. And that doesn't include the current 17 cents of every federal dollar being spent on servicing the national debt. Defense is considered a "discretionary" expense.
4
posted on
03/29/2008 6:30:42 AM PDT
by
kabar
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It would seem so, but the continental western Europeans are militarily fat, lazy and complacent. When the military conquest of the parts of Europe not taken over by Moslem immigration takes place they will rue the day they accepted American help and forgot that it is their responsibility to defend themselves. (Is that a run-on sentence?)
5
posted on
03/29/2008 6:33:10 AM PDT
by
oneolcop
(Take off the gloves!)
To: kellynla
Which is why Germany is being reduced to two US Brigades and why German stationed US Brigades have been rotating to Iraq just like the rest (EG 2SCR).
To: 2ndDivisionVet
is easy to mock both Nato's and the EU's defence records. Both are in different ways cold war structures that have struggled to adjust to post-cold war realities. They duplicate and they overlap, providing lots of jobs for people who lead comfortable lives attending endless planning sessions at considerable cost but to quite modest effect How does one apply for a job at NATO?
7
posted on
03/29/2008 6:46:39 AM PDT
by
Sawdring
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If Europe's GDP exceeds ours, shouldn't their defense spending, as well? It's not 1948 anymore, it's 2008.WELL SAID!
You had an excellent point...it just needed a little more pizazz ;-)
8
posted on
03/29/2008 6:47:29 AM PDT
by
NordP
(Yeah...Clinton didn't inhale and Obama didn't know 'nothin' 'bout Rev Wright bein' wrong)
To: DJ Elliott
I think the days of us defending a Europe unwilling to defend it self should be ended. Just reading some of the responses at the end of this article tells me these bunch of mooching lemmings should be left to their own self imposed fate. Fifty years of sacrificing our wealth and lives of our sons have bought nothing but scorn and jealously. F%^k’em!!!!
9
posted on
03/29/2008 6:47:37 AM PDT
by
ontap
(Just another backstabbing conservative)
To: kellynla
And those 75K troops stationed in Germany would be of better use in Iraq & Afghanistan. Those 75,000 troops have been in Iraq and Afganistan. Many of them several times.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hasn’t NATO outlived it’s usefulness? What purpose does it serve except to allow the European countries to cut their own defense spending and shift responsibility for their protection to us? The U.S. could easily withdraw from NATO without weakening our defense position in the slightest.
To: ontap
12
posted on
03/29/2008 6:59:12 AM PDT
by
alarm rider
("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -)
To: oneolcop
"It would seem so, but the continental western Europeans are militarily fat, lazy and complacent. When the military conquest of the parts of Europe not taken over by Moslem immigration takes place they will rue the day they accepted American help and forgot that it is their responsibility to defend themselves."The Muslim situation in Europe brings to mind the early days of Hitler, in the sense that there must be some Europeans who are asking themselves if now would be a good time to take advantage of the high Euro and purchase that "vacation" place in the US; if only for their children (assuming they buck the trend and have children).
Any Freeper real estate agents notice activity from Europe?
13
posted on
03/29/2008 7:02:25 AM PDT
by
LZ_Bayonet
(There's Always Something.............And there's always something worse!)
To: LZ_Bayonet
Any Freeper real estate agents notice activity from Europe?I do believe you're onto something there... A lot of them go to Canada.
14
posted on
03/29/2008 7:05:38 AM PDT
by
oneolcop
(Take off the gloves!)
To: ontap
Actually, the main reason we still have military in Europe is so that we have bases closer to the real trouble spots. Forward bases make it faster and less expensive to project power to those regions of the world where it is needed.
I for one, would like them to be brought home and "forward based" on the Mexican border.
15
posted on
03/29/2008 7:10:32 AM PDT
by
oneolcop
(Take off the gloves!)
To: oneolcop
The number of European socialists qua Marxists who have bought property in the San Francisco Bay Area would astound you.
16
posted on
03/29/2008 7:14:46 AM PDT
by
Melchior
To: oneolcop
17
posted on
03/29/2008 7:17:13 AM PDT
by
ontap
(Just another backstabbing conservative)
To: Melchior
No, it wouldn't. I've written off California to the extent possible. I still have a daughter and two grandkids there and I still collect a pension from there, but the state and especially SF are lost.
Sad- my wife was born and later served in the Army on the Presidio of San Francisco. To see what has happened there is so very sad.
18
posted on
03/29/2008 7:28:19 AM PDT
by
oneolcop
(Take off the gloves!)
To: ontap
The problem is we would be throwing the baby out with teh dirty water.
NATO is not just France and Germany. Several countries in NATO that are pulling their weight would also be abandoned... (EG Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Denmark, Poland,...)
To: DJ Elliott
No! The problem is we need to remove the baby from the basin and dispose of the filthy water and refill the basin with clean water. i.e. dump the moochers and let them fend for themselves and retain the true allies.
20
posted on
03/29/2008 7:40:06 AM PDT
by
ontap
(Just another backstabbing conservative)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson