To: Samizdat
“Congential” is the wrong word. It means that she was that way at birth, and effectively excuses her behavior. “Pathological” is a better adjective in this case.
To: Content Provider
“Congential” is the wrong word. It means that she was that way at birth, and effectively excuses her behavior. “Pathological” is a better adjective in this case.Both are true.
In addition, blatant, constant, non-caring, obsessive, condescending, ineffectual, ... {additional adjectives may also be relevant}.
8 posted on
03/26/2008 12:21:02 PM PDT by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
To: Content Provider
hmm... Hillary Clinton and Al Gore.
What is it about these “smartest-people-in-the-room” types (or so they think) that have another common thread: pathological liars???
9 posted on
03/26/2008 12:22:48 PM PDT by
davandbar
(CLINTONThere's no limit to how much credit a man can get, if he doesn't care what he's actually done)
To: Content Provider
Bill Safire said it..that’s good enough for me...
He was one good reporter...smart, funny, conservative..
and from New York...that is unique. I wonder how
he is doing since retired? ANYONE KNOW? JK
To: Content Provider
"Congential” is the wrong word. It means that she was that way at birth, and effectively excuses her behavior. “Pathological” is a better adjective in this case. No, congential is a perfectly good word to describe Hillary. She is a "born liar". It doesn't excuse her, it condemns her, which is appropriate. Safire is a word smith of renown. He knew what he was saying.
20 posted on
03/26/2008 1:28:11 PM PDT by
mc5cents
(Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson