Replies

“...that’s why it was banned by China’s censors”
Why? You are both on the same page when it comes to Tibet’s very legitimate struggle for independence.

Hardly. I may not favor Independence for Tibet (unless mutually agreed upon), but I definitely do not agree with China's handling of Tibet.

“...I’d suggest you stop with the insults because I don’t have the time for childish nonsense”
Give me a break - you started with the liberal comparisons.

No, actually it was you with your "Chicom Magnet Thread" and "Chicom Tool" comments. Scroll through if you can't remember.

“The Yuan and Qing dynasties were both ‘foreign’ rule over China, but it is Chinese history because it was during the Yuan time period that the independent states [of China] were unified for the first time...”
By that logic, the constituent colonies should necessarily be independent countries (as they were prior to the Mongol conquest). If they want to be in a ChiCom federation, that’s their right. However, we are not talking about a voluntary union here but a continuation of the colonization by the ChiComs.

Not at all. China has maintained those boundaries (with the exception of the foreign controlled areas during the Qing Dynasty) since unification, only the governments have changes; Yuan / Ming / Qing / Republic of China / Brief "Dynasty" by Yuan ShiKai / People's Republic of China.

You also seem to be forgetting that not all Tibetans want Independence, including the Dalai Lama.

Dr. Marten - it’s hardly my fault if your posts on Tibet are remarkably identical to the ones posted by the PLAN agents on this forum. They use the very same logic and arguments to support ChiCom dominance and genocide.

BTW, what is this business about “mutually-agreed upon independence”? Do you think the United States would have ever become independent if the British had a say and veto power over the revolutionaries? Why is it any different in case of China - the oppressor and colonizing power in Tibet?

“I definitely do not agree with China’s handling of Tibet.”

Well...at least there’s something that we agree on even if we disagree on the need for an oppressed peoples to enjoy liberty and freedom.