There is nothing more empty than repetitions of the same failed arguments. The style and substance of your debate might work in a high school lunch room but it wouldn't even be acceptable on a high school debating team. Insults and credentials, repeated endlessly, are not equivalent to substantive responses addressed to issues. You haven't done the latter even once.
There is nothing more empty than repetitions of the same failed arguments. The style and substance of your debate might work in a high school lunch room but it wouldn't even be acceptable on a high school debating team. Insults and credentials, repeated endlessly, are not equivalent to substantive responses addressed to issues. You haven't done the latter even once.
Speaking of a high school debate team, do you honestly think "Students for a Free Tibet" would pass for credibility in an argument? No, it wouldn't.
You have failed to offer any rebuttal to the other statements you've made in reference to your credibility. "You know some Tibetans", "You've read some testimonies"...blah blah blah.
You don't know anything from your own experiences. You're simply regurgitating second-hand knowledge for which you have no citations. That's called hearsay.
Talk about credentials, you have none. You can't even provide a single academic citation for any of the assertions you've made, but you'll respond by saying the same. In other words, you HAVE NOTHING.
FYI, Wikipedia is not accepted as an academic source. So, given your pride in posting the first link to wikipedia as your source, you are now obligated to provide the actual source of your information.
You Sir, are a fraud and the closest you will ever come to a brain storm is a light drizzle.
There is nothing more empty than repetitions of the same failed arguments.
They're not arguments until you have addressed them. Until then, they simply highlight your ignorance.