Replies

I already refuted your only substantive contribution to this thread and you have not rebutted it with anything. You seem to be the one with nothing.

Post #84

Post #86

I think that history on Wikipedia is fairly decent. It matches pretty well what I have read in other accounts from Tibetan sources. If you read the paragraph in post #47 carefully it does not indicate a Han Chinese domination of political affairs in the least. It actually says the Mongols placed Tibetans and Uighurs in authority over the Han Chinese. The Yuan empire was Mongolian not Chinese.

Obviously you do not understand the previous statements of history that I have provided. It's easy to understand why.

Nothing you are saying adds anything to the subject or addresses anything you have been challenged on. Your continued pissing contest tactics are boring, windy and arrogant. I doubt that you have ever attended a college. It is unlikely, considering your extremely poor logic skills, that you even graduated high school. Good night. I have better things to do now that I have forced you to expose your ignorance.

Translation: You have nothing. Your pot-calling-the-kettle-black tactics are all that have been exposed. You are about as ignorant as they come and simply choose to respond as you see fit; regardless of what's been asked.

You've never been to Tibet; never been to China and it's doubtful you've ever even left the United States. Hell, you probably don't even have a passport and that's a good thing.

Your inability to debate the topic at hand in an objective manner only leads one to believe that you have no authoritive voice to speak from. In other words, you can't win so you result to insults and invented contacts to inflate your sense of knowledge on a topic you know nothing about.