Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massachusetts To Criminalise "Lookism?" Considers Ban On Weight, Height Discrimination
Boston Herald ^ | March 25, 2008 | Michael Graham

Posted on 03/25/2008 11:16:18 AM PDT by suspects

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2008 11:16:20 AM PDT by suspects
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: suspects
Graham was talking about this on his show this morning. If only the proposed legislation were merely hideously embarrassing.
2 posted on 03/25/2008 11:20:17 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects

hey! waddaya think? I’m a protected class!:-) (ugly AND fat)


3 posted on 03/25/2008 11:20:41 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects

The legislator in question...

4 posted on 03/25/2008 11:22:32 AM PDT by vikingd00d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects

Rush saw this coming years ago, civil rights for Uglo-Americans.


5 posted on 03/25/2008 11:28:09 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (El Conservo Tribe, tribal name "Avoids Fort Marcy Park" Watching the Rat Fight. typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle

“But businesses would have to prove that appearance was essential to the job.”

Will they next have to prove that intelligence, common sense, good hygiene, and personal integrity are essential?


6 posted on 03/25/2008 11:28:21 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d

“What if an employer decides that black people aren’t attractive? What then?”

In my local hooters, black gals are as attractive and popular as the white and hispanic gals.

Rushing’s legislative motives are clear. He wants to be able to pick.


7 posted on 03/25/2008 11:32:38 AM PDT by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: suspects

IOW the complainer empowerement act.

This is to give the little wussy crybaby who never learned to stand up for himself the ability to beat up on the self actualized.


8 posted on 03/25/2008 11:36:12 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
You are just a cog like every other cog! Dehumanize by legislating against human nature - the road to hell is paved by libs.

If in my business I believe that every employee represents the character and image of my company, do I have to disparage my company image by hiring the unkept, disheveled unwashed masses? I think it would be much better to consider a business as private property of the owners and their hiring choices as a private matter. If the market responds negatively they will adjust or vanish. No tyranny required.

9 posted on 03/25/2008 11:38:31 AM PDT by DaveyB (Ignorance is part of the human condition - atheism makes it permanent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: suspects

I guess they will have to hold the Miss Massachusetts contest outside the state from now on.


10 posted on 03/25/2008 11:39:21 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects
“What if an employer decides that black people aren’t attractive? What then?”

Then he may well be gay.


11 posted on 03/25/2008 11:42:01 AM PDT by avacado (Thomas Sowell: "Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham
its too bad it has to come to this, but "lookism" primarily affects women, not men...

otherwise, the likes of Larry King and Don Imus would have long gone.....

let's hear the refrain again about "hooters" being a family restaurant......LOL....now we hear that it IS about the boobs, period....

12 posted on 03/25/2008 11:45:24 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: camle

I got you beat. I’m a real troll. Does this mean I can sue a super model for declining a date or other physical means of gratification? Sweeeet!


13 posted on 03/25/2008 11:46:15 AM PDT by lafroste (gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: suspects
Massachusetts To Criminalise "Lookism?" Considers Ban On Weight, Height Discrimination

People and jobs not fleeing the state fast enough, eh?

14 posted on 03/25/2008 11:48:14 AM PDT by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects
A rallying cry for every uglo-american. Viva los feos!

This will never fly in California. Liberal as they are, the whole culture out there is based on "lookism".
15 posted on 03/25/2008 11:49:04 AM PDT by Antoninus (Tell us how you came to Barack?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado

Is this where I say “Not Guilty”...

or is it “I’d buy that for a dollar?”


16 posted on 03/25/2008 11:49:56 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
I guess they will have to hold the Miss Massachusetts contest outside the state from now on.

Heh heh heh.

The general rule is that broads get better looking the more south and west you go in this country.

17 posted on 03/25/2008 11:53:05 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

This was what John Lennon called “Bagism” in the late 60s. You can’t judge someone’s character if you don’t concentrate on their personal physical characteristics. Of course, the way dear John chose to exemplify that was typically nutty! :-D


18 posted on 03/25/2008 11:54:11 AM PDT by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: suspects
Rep. Byron Rushing

Byron couldn't buy a hooker on Kneeland Street

19 posted on 03/25/2008 11:57:11 AM PDT by Little Bill (Welcome to the Newly Socialist State of New Hampshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects
Following is this idiot's e-mail address:

Rep.ByronRushing@hou.state.ma.us

Tell him what you think of his idea.

Carolyn

20 posted on 03/25/2008 12:00:42 PM PDT by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson