[ClearCase_guy]

When the best intelligence agencies in the US and overseas tell the president that Saddam is seeking uranium in Africa, and the president passes that information on to the American public, he is being as accurate and truthful as he can be. If it turns out that the intelligence was (potentially) flawed, then those "sixteen words" can brand him as a liar for years. Because he's a Republican.

But, Hillary, well ... she just misspoke. It's just a blip.

[nikos1121]

The article is very surreal. The right answer is simply:

“I was wrong. Perhaps I was thinking of some other trip, or it was so long ago that I can’t recall etc.”

This was a bold faced lie...Pure and simple...a bold faced lie. Now we’re told that if we “continue to ask her questions on this, then she’ll accuse the media of swiftboating her.”

She lied. Get it, anyone? She flatly lied!

I know many of us are not thrilled to say the least about McCain, but I will crawl to the polling booths to vote for him before I’d vote for the two clowns the dems have put up.

[Former MSM Viewer]

Brilliant connection...more Americans need to open their eyes.

Thanks

[Enchante]

Excellent point on how the MSM and Demagogues treated the “sixteen words” and the comparison with this case.

President Bush spoke words that are still literally true - the Brits have stood by their intel claim. In any case, he reported to the American public and Congress on what he was told by the intel agencies, not something he made up.

OTOH, Shrillary concocts a tale out of whole cloth, in order to have a good campaign story to support her important (sic) role in diplomacy of the ‘90s, and it turns out there is conclusive video, photo, and witness evidence available to show she LIED. As in fabricated, invented, concocted, b.s.-ed her way through.