Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: torchthemummy
Even with Rush's advocacy to cross-vote the decision to do such was made by individual voters. Thus the state would have to prove, on an individual basis, whom was "dishonest" in switching registration/cross-voting. They would need witnesses, confessions by the voter etc. And who is to disprove that once in the voting booth some had a change of heart and pocketed the ballot. If the theory is to not cross-over vote because Ronnie Earl and Mike Nifong-type malicious Democrat prosecutors exist the difference is that, again, they would have to mount thousands of individual cases or else none.

Not all at. The prosecutor could covene what's known as a "special grand jury" to investigate "possible voter fraud in the state of Ohio." He could then subpoena every single person (if he wanted) to come before the grand jury to explain why they switched at the last minute. You're naive if you don't think at least a few would spill the proverbial beans about "operation chaos," especially in exchange for immunity.

Then, the prosecutor, having the proverbial ham sandwich to go with those beans, indicts Rush for something. Or, if the indictment looks too iffy for even an out of control Dem, he has the Grand Jury issue a "Special Report" finding that, while insufficient evidence existed to warrant indictment, "some reasonable cause exists" to find that Rush Limbaugh and others interefered with the conduct of the Democrat primary in an effort to assist the GOP chances in November.

The MSM will, of course, jump on that report and make sure it's a front page story about how "evile Republicans" are subverting democracy. Then the narrative will become how the "racist GOP" fought to steal the nomination from Obama and/or how the "corrupt" forces of "hate radio" worked to thwart democracy.

All of which plays right into Hillary's hands, since it makes people forget how SHE tried to smear obama.

Pretty soon, Hillary's in the White House, Janet Reno's on the Supreme Court, Harry Reid is reintroducing the Fairness Doctrine, and Rush and his listener's are sitting around like Wile E. Coyote with an anvil on his head, wondering how they got tricked one more time.

284 posted on 03/23/2008 7:29:30 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]


To: Behind Liberal Lines

I saw that TV movie. “Amerika”. Maybe you should try some SciFi.


288 posted on 03/23/2008 7:30:57 PM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
And conveniently ignore the opposite party doing the same thing? Or Dem campaign workers that pay people for phony voter registrations with crack cocaine?

Yeah, I'd love to see that prosecution go forward.
290 posted on 03/23/2008 7:31:20 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson