[OCCASparky]

Good luck proving it. Find a voter who will state that they crossed party lines based solely on what Rush said.

I don't see it happening.

[TheZMan]

Ding. Further, the ones that pulled it off are likely capable of telling the reporter a few things that won’t make it on air too.

[UCANSEE2]

“Find a voter who will state that they crossed party lines based solely on what Rush said.”

They could probably find a bunch of Democrat voters who will ‘say’ they were Republicans who were convinced by ‘that Rush something guy’ to cross over and vote in the Democratic Primary.

[HardStarboard]

>>>Good luck proving it. Find a voter who will state that they crossed party lines based solely on what Rush said. <<<

In order to implicate Rush, the State would have to prove the "mind numbed robot" syndrome exists and the voter was in its control; the voters free will did not enter into his decision at all!

Not likely - even in front of a Democrat judge.

[Nomorjer Kinov]

Beyond that, if the voter had to swear allegience to his new party, I doubt the law prescribes the duration of that allegience. The voter could simply say they have shifted allegience again.